Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
117. You can start with this exercise in prejudgment and inanity and wade through the rest.
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 01:49 PM
Dec 2013
With the above, I’m not encompassing fence-sitters and liberal Christians. Such people aren’t really Abrahamic theists; they ignore the genocide, rape, chauvinism, and slavery, while only focusing on the happy lines. Cherry picking the nice parts doesn’t really make you a true believer. In actuality, they’ve created a new ideology distinct from the Biblical reality. They are Christian-ish. They can be reasoned with, because they never accepted the entire book to begin with.


I've done it once. I won't do it twice, not even for you. Sorry, ed.
This is why the term "bigotry" does not apply to criticizing religious beliefs. arcane1 Dec 2013 #1
Did you have a point you wanted to make? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #2
Explain this: "While your attraction to anything with "asshole" in the title is understandable" rug Dec 2013 #4
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #5
Explain what you ean by "attraction to anything with asshole". rug Dec 2013 #6
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #8
Explain yourself. I don't want to assume your remark is homophobic. rug Dec 2013 #10
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #11
The assumption is now warranted. rug Dec 2013 #12
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #13
Run away from your words. They're still here. rug Dec 2013 #17
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #18
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #20
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #23
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #24
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #25
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #29
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #30
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #37
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #42
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #44
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #46
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #54
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #55
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #57
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #60
Did you have a point you wanted to make by using homophobic language? rug Dec 2013 #64
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #65
Did you have a point you wanted to make by using homophobic language? rug Dec 2013 #66
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #68
Did you have a point you wanted to make by using homophobic language? rug Dec 2013 #70
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #71
So, explain it. rug Dec 2013 #73
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #77
Did you have a point you wanted to make by using homophobic language? rug Dec 2013 #81
Hey! We women have assholes, too! PassingFair Dec 2013 #163
I wonder if the fact that I find a woman's asshole more far more attractive ... spin Dec 2013 #177
I don't know that isolated, and, perhaps, depilatated, that I could even differentiate... PassingFair Dec 2013 #178
That's a good point. I'm not sure that I could tell the difference either. (n/t) spin Dec 2013 #179
Well, some theists will call atheists assholes no matter what they say. longship Dec 2013 #7
Can't really argue with you, but is like to know rug's reason for posting this. cleanhippie Dec 2013 #9
I'd like to know why you keep distancing yourself from your own words. rug Dec 2013 #15
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #16
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #19
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #21
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #22
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #26
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #28
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #31
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #34
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #39
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #45
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #47
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #49
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #51
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #59
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #62
Did you have a point you wanted to make by using homophobic language? rug Dec 2013 #67
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #69
Did you have a point you wanted to make by using homophobic language? rug Dec 2013 #72
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #74
Did you have a point you wanted to make by using homophobic language? rug Dec 2013 #80
Well, you only asked him a few times. longship Dec 2013 #32
I don't have a point, I have a question. cleanhippie Dec 2013 #38
I have a pointed question. rug Dec 2013 #52
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #53
Sigh, more evasion. rug Dec 2013 #56
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #58
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #61
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #63
Did you have a point you wanted to make by using homophobic language? rug Dec 2013 #75
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #78
Did you have a point you wanted to make by using homophobic language? rug Dec 2013 #82
Or maybe you should discuss the topic of the post instead of the one who posted it. longship Dec 2013 #83
I'd just like to know the reason it was posted. cleanhippie Dec 2013 #88
Three dozen times seems excessive, doesn't it? nt longship Dec 2013 #89
If you say so. cleanhippie Dec 2013 #90
Your real response to Rug HERVEPA Dec 2013 #181
This Demosthenes is as pissed off at what he calls "politically correct athests". rug Dec 2013 #14
Well, no matter what one writes or says on the topic it's gonna piss somebody off. longship Dec 2013 #27
I don't know why cleanhippie's so pissed off by that post. rug Dec 2013 #33
... longship Dec 2013 #36
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #40
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting "attraction to anything with asshole"? rug Dec 2013 #48
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #50
You. rug Dec 2013 #76
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #79
You're up to three dozen evasions. rug Dec 2013 #84
Did you have a point you wanted to make by posting this article? cleanhippie Dec 2013 #87
I see you had a good rest. rug Dec 2013 #100
A fairly straight polemic. longship Dec 2013 #3
For me, it is not "you dedicated your entire life to a colossal mistake" BlueStreak Dec 2013 #35
That's where it is for me, too. longship Dec 2013 #41
Well, for me, bad rhetoric is right there at the top of the list wth it. rug Dec 2013 #43
What is wrong with that edhopper Dec 2013 #91
It is the flip side of Duck Dynasty. rug Dec 2013 #98
How so? edhopper Dec 2013 #105
It has half the charm and a quarter of the intellect. rug Dec 2013 #109
eye of the beholder indeed. edhopper Dec 2013 #111
You guess wrong. rug Dec 2013 #113
Which beliefs does the author show disrespect for edhopper Dec 2013 #114
You can start with this exercise in prejudgment and inanity and wade through the rest. rug Dec 2013 #117
I would call that edhopper Dec 2013 #118
I would call it what he calls it in his headline. rug Dec 2013 #120
so you posted this for people to see edhopper Dec 2013 #122
I agree pretty much with what he said too, but Starboard Tack Dec 2013 #123
I heard you were under the weather. rug Dec 2013 #124
Thanks. I'm coming out of it. Almost back to normal. Starboard Tack Dec 2013 #127
Good to see you. pinto Dec 2013 #135
You too, my friend Starboard Tack Dec 2013 #162
Go figure. rug Dec 2013 #125
Well, edhopper Dec 2013 #136
I didn't. rug Dec 2013 #137
so why did you post it. edhopper Dec 2013 #140
It sounded familiar. rug Dec 2013 #142
thanks for clarifying edhopper Dec 2013 #147
"Slaves, obey your masters"; biblical quote Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #128
"Tippecanoe and Tyler too"; political quote rug Dec 2013 #129
A part of the Bible. And one used by the South as part of its basis for slavery. (Cf. also "Ham"). Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #133
Oh, please . . . . rug Dec 2013 #134
"Oh please"? Is that a cogent argument? So far, you've answered no objections whatsoever Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #143
If you give me an original argument you may get one. rug Dec 2013 #146
Still no answer to the objection say that Judeo-Christ supports killing innocent "sons" of Egyptians Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #149
There are dozen of answers. rug Dec 2013 #150
Mine is a classic objection that you still have not answered Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #151
If it's classic, it's not yours. rug Dec 2013 #152
It's classic, because its a durable objection to Christianity; one that hasn't been refuted Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #153
If the objection was dispositive, it would no longer be an objection. rug Dec 2013 #155
It remains "an objection" rather than established fact, only to "believers" who believe, over reason Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #156
After you're done, look up the difference between opinion and fact. rug Dec 2013 #159
The historical facts are clear: for centuries religious killings cited the Bible as authorization Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #167
So The Biblical Flood of Noah never happened? And was never asserted either? Or was somehow, Good? Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #92
Of course it didn't happen as described BlueStreak Dec 2013 #93
So two problems with religion: it's not factually true. AND however, it says mass killings are good Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #94
Allegory is not inherently bad BlueStreak Dec 2013 #95
Allegory per se, can be good. But what is THIS specific allegory saying? Is its message good? Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #96
It's what happens when you take a Babylonian Flood story edhopper Dec 2013 #97
There's another claim in there. rug Dec 2013 #99
So killing first-born Egyptian sons is OK, or even plausibly moral? Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #103
Should anyone (atheists etc.) really respect such a view? Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #107
He, and apparently you, should understand didactic literature before claiming anyone is rug Dec 2013 #110
The word "didactic" commonly has a negative meaning: excessive moralizing. Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #116
No it doesn't. It means teaching. rug Dec 2013 #119
Your dictionary is too small. In Art say, "didactic" implies inevitably simplistic rule-making. Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #121
The article isn't about Art, though your definition fits it. rug Dec 2013 #126
The full OED is probably still off line; too commercially valuable - and definitive Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #130
No, I just checked. It's paid subscription only now. rug Dec 2013 #132
FWIW, I can access it through my library muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #141
Thanks. I'll have to check the pricing and see if they have a single-use fee should the need arise. rug Dec 2013 #144
That's probably the "short" OED? The long OED definition should fill about a typed page or so Brettongarcia Dec 2013 #145
I didn't give the quotations muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #157
Well, no, it actually doesn't. okasha Dec 2013 #165
Like the myth edhopper Dec 2013 #108
There's a lot of myth in the story of the Nativity. rug Dec 2013 #112
Sure edhopper Dec 2013 #115
Noah's flood was probably due to climate change. ... spin Dec 2013 #180
Similar concept in thread by nomorenomore08 linked below intaglio Dec 2013 #85
Yet there comes a point when "tone" becoomes a personality disorder. rug Dec 2013 #102
At this point Inkfreak Dec 2013 #86
Lol! rug Dec 2013 #101
Well, the juvenile nature of this OP is certainly reflected in the conversation cbayer Dec 2013 #104
+1 madrchsod Dec 2013 #154
That pretty much sums it up. dimbear Dec 2013 #158
Outside of the rest of the thread, the OP is actually right, I mean... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #106
That my friend is bullshit and you know it. Leontius Dec 2013 #148
Not really, from my own observations in discussing various... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #160
From my own observations in discussing various cbayer Dec 2013 #164
Your attempt at a role reversal doesn't really make any sense... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #166
I don't even know where to start with that video, as I find it one of cbayer Dec 2013 #170
Yes over the top reactions by anti-theists, and if you want, I can search for many... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #173
I think there are over the top reactions on both ends of the spectrum. cbayer Dec 2013 #174
You could start edhopper Dec 2013 #168
I have never called everyone who rejects the idea of gods anti-theists. Never. cbayer Dec 2013 #169
Okay edhopper Dec 2013 #171
I don't care whether people debate the existence of god, cbayer Dec 2013 #172
You mean we instead of I? edhopper Dec 2013 #175
Yes, we instead of I. cbayer Dec 2013 #176
Maybe you should start a thread. edhopper Dec 2013 #182
I think not. It would mostly likely be a flame war. cbayer Dec 2013 #183
I don't think edhopper Dec 2013 #184
This OP got you guys talking. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #131
Not counting 72 posts. rug Dec 2013 #138
lol I love both of you. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #139
does this mean we can start talking about "Protestantism minus the Christianity"? MisterP Dec 2013 #161
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»In Defense of “Asshole” A...»Reply #117