Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

National Security & Defense

Atman

(31,464 posts)

7. Hmm...thread kind of died after I pointed out the timeline.

Reply to BridgeTheGap (Original post)

Fri Jun 22, 2012, 01:28 PM

Jun 2012

Why is that? I think Bush is as evil as the next guy, but it's a legitimate question...why does this article impugn Bush, but mentions nothing of the intel they had under Clinton?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New NSA docs contradict 9/11 claims of Bush administration [View all] BridgeTheGap Jun 2012 OP

Those who said they Let It Happen On Purpose have been right all along... rfranklin Jun 2012 #1

Yep liberal N proud Jun 2012 #3

So CLINTON missed Bin Laden? Atman Jun 2012 #2

*bush took the office January 20 th,2001... FarPoint Jun 2012 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author Atman Jun 2012 #5

I understand that...9 months is NOT "a full year." Atman Jun 2012 #6

Hmm...thread kind of died after I pointed out the timeline. Atman Jun 2012 #7

Remember that the Oklahoma City bombing led to the BridgeTheGap Jun 2012 #8

I distinctly remember that Bush was accused of juajen Oct 2012 #9