Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 05:27 PM Oct 2012

Updated: A poll for the modification of the SOP [View all]

Last edited Tue Oct 23, 2012, 01:43 PM - Edit history (2)

Proposed: Discuss the right to keep and bear arms relating to laws, the Second Amendment and the use of firearms for self-defense, committing crimes and violence.



ETA: As I read the current SOP, laws which are not gun control measures nor the actual second amendment can only be discussed in relation to a crime or an instance of self-defense or other violence. This would IMHO exclude the discussion of laws such as SYG as it is not a "gun control law".

Sorry for any confusion.


4 votes, 4 passes | Time left: Unlimited
In favor of this change
3 (75%)
Against this and favor the current SOP
1 (25%)
Against this and favor an SOP which I'll post below
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Updated: A poll for the modification of the SOP [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 OP
It's already been made quite clear the SOP for this group isn't going to change NT Trunk Monkey Oct 2012 #1
re: "It's already been made quite clear..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #6
After reading your edit I admit you have an interesting premise Trunk Monkey Oct 2012 #10
me, too discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #11
I don't see the need for a change. Glaug-Eldare Oct 2012 #2
Mostly, I just wanted to make explicit... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #5
Ah, I see what you mean. Glaug-Eldare Oct 2012 #7
You're welcome discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #8
I'm confused ... holdencaufield Oct 2012 #3
Responding to this post as it's most recent discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #4
OP updated n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #9
lol ellisonz Oct 2012 #12
The gunners seem to have as much trouble interpreting the SOP SecularMotion Oct 2012 #13
+1000 ellisonz Oct 2012 #16
It seems you pro-control folks... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #18
No... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #14
What part of "use of" don't you understand? ellisonz Oct 2012 #15
Please highlight for me... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #17
Oy Vey ellisonz Oct 2012 #19
In the current SOP... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #20
I shudder to think how you would read the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution. ellisonz Oct 2012 #22
A topic on which... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #23
If I can't piss on Ronald Reagan's grave, whose grave can I piss on? gejohnston Oct 2012 #21
kick n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Updated: A poll for the m...»Reply #0