Gun Control & RKBA

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)

48. Again what does that have to do with this thread?

Reply to 4th law of robotics (Reply #46)

Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:44 PM

Jul 2012

You are calling out people who either are not here or do not exist.
You are spewing stereotypes with comments like "Anti-gun nuts".

I don't see any in this thread. Do you?
What I do see is a bunch of guys searching for an invisible target to justify their carrying loaded guns around in public, which has ZERO to do with this thread.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"He said 'don't shoot me again," [View all] ileus Jul 2012 OP

She shot someone over her property? Over money? Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #1

Fail on all counts. Did you bother to read the piece? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #9

I read the WHOLE piece. And I have learned from many here how to read BETWEEN the lines. Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #13

even after pleading for his life she blowt a hole in his innocent ass. ileus Jul 2012 #14

I see. If nobody opposes an action you just make shit up. Got it. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #18

I've learned from the best and brightest, right here on the Gun Control Group. Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #19

- Snort - (New keyboard time) n/t shadowrider Jul 2012 #20

Why didn't she just defend herself without a gun 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #2

Why would she do that if she had a gun? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #10

Quick someone tell her guns kill people. you're 500x more ileus Jul 2012 #15

I thought the bad guys always disarmed the gun owners Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #23

You're right this must be an NRA propaganda piece. ileus Jul 2012 #24

Hmm, might be Lapierre in drag. Tejas Jul 2012 #35

Because she's racist? Tejas Jul 2012 #36

She could/should have used that walker to defend herself. rl6214 Jul 2012 #53

Classic case of Castle Doctrine permatex Jul 2012 #3

Or she could have used her jo staff, or some sneaky ninjutsu moves. Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #5

Or.............wait for it................................ permatex Jul 2012 #6

Typical bully. Marinedem Jul 2012 #4

Blood-thirsty NRA members are like that. Tejas Jul 2012 #8

Right. She really looks like a NRA member Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #11

Another zimmerlaugorish in the wings. ileus Jul 2012 #17

Shouldn't that be Weazimmerlaugorish? n/t shadowrider Jul 2012 #21

wevorishlaugzime....let's go in proper order. ileus Jul 2012 #25

She did it for street cred, she should do time. Tejas Jul 2012 #7

I'm trying to figure out... -..__... Jul 2012 #32

Interesting how nobody is condemning this Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #12

"Interesting how nobody is condemning this" TPaine7 Jul 2012 #22

Looks like most every post is some type of condemnation of her actions. ileus Jul 2012 #26

Not really. This is my first mention of the self-styled "Goddess" since she left. n/t TPaine7 Jul 2012 #37

I don't think we have any anti-rights posters. Hopefully. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #28

We do here on DU, but they are not posting on this thread ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #50

Really? All I see is a lot of name calling. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #52

WTF? rl6214 Jul 2012 #54

I think it's interesting that no one has labeled her a de facto racist 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #27

Sounds like you are the one with the problem Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #29

I don't have a problem with this 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #31

What does any of that have to do with this thread? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #45

You're really not getting this 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #46

Again what does that have to do with this thread? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #48

And we're done 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #49

If only the poser from Italy could have got old people banned... ileus Jul 2012 #16

What's this? You're reaching to folk who aren't here to make a non-existent point. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #30

I don't get the reference 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #34

we used to have a spammer blogger that posted here.... ileus Jul 2012 #40

Ah got it 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #47

"Don't shoot me again" !?!... -..__... Jul 2012 #33

Good home gun owner -- not a toter -- and didn't shoot him in back once he ran away. Hoyt Jul 2012 #38

This would be her cup of STFU for you: Tejas Jul 2012 #39

Still didn't shoot him in the back while fleeing like many here admit they would. Hoyt Jul 2012 #41

Correct, between the eyes would cut down on the paperwork. Tejas Jul 2012 #42

You must have smelled the blood of the Denver shooting. Might be a good idea to leave your guns Hoyt Jul 2012 #43

I did notice the blood on your shoes. Tejas Jul 2012 #44

Too bad a 79 year old Sacramento lady didn't own a gun Mimosa Jul 2012 #51