Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 10:23 AM Jun 2012

Law enforcement officials back closing the 'gun-show loophole' [View all]

I for one am glad to see this and it has been a long time coming. This will close one of the gateways that is currently being used for people to buy guns who should't ordinarily be able to own a gun. I just hope they don't try and load up the legislation with a bunch of unrelated non-sense. Time will tell as I don't think any real legislation has of yet been written.


Law enforcement officials from across the state on Tuesday called for stricter background checks to make it more difficult for criminals to obtain firearms if they are prohibited by law from having guns.

"This is not about infringing on people's right to own guns, purchase guns, sell guns," Fairfax City Police Chief Richard J. Rappoport said. "Law enforcement and lawmakers ought to sit down and try to figure out how we can regulate that in a way that keeps guns out of the hands of dangerous people."

Rappoport, a past president of the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police, joined several law enforcement officials from around Virginia and elsewhere at a news conference Tuesday at the Berkeley Hotel in Richmond.

Speakers said they support a federal law that would close the so-called "gun-show loophole," which allows buyers to purchase from unlicensed sellers without having to go through a criminal background check.

"We need a federal law to address these issues," said Hubert Williams, chairman of the National Law Enforcement Partnership to Prevent Gun Violence.

Rappoport said a solution needs to be found to keep dangerous people from going online, putting the word out that they need a gun and getting one without having to submit to a background check.

"A person can go on the Internet using the pseudonym 'Fred' and arrange to buy a semiautomatic weapon from someone using the pseudonym 'Sam' and meet in a dark parking lot and money exchange hands and weapons exchange hands," he said.

Rappoport said those kinds of sales need to be made illegal "so that we move legitimate buyers and legitimate sellers into a legitimate marketplace that's regulated."

Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a gun-rights organization, countered that people should be able to meet and sell guns just as they would sell anything else online at sites such as Craigslist.com.


***MORE AT LINK***

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/virginia-politics/2012/jun/27/tdmet02-law-enforcement-officials-back-closing-the-ar-2015984/
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not sure I agree... mvccd1000 Jun 2012 #1
The 10A US Constitution (Bill of Rights)... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2012 #8
Worthless article and worthless topic.... PavePusher Jun 2012 #2
No problem Meiko Jun 2012 #11
One thing people leave out when they describe the "loophole" Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #3
That's easy to solve. NewMoonTherian Jun 2012 #5
That's basically how MD does private handgun transfers Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #13
How can a federal law regulate intrastate commerce? hack89 Jun 2012 #4
Oh come now. You know better than that. NewMoonTherian Jun 2012 #6
Hell, look at Wickard v. Filburn Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #14
Good thing the president has more sense than to try this. nt hack89 Jun 2012 #17
How do they intend to enforce this? NewMoonTherian Jun 2012 #7
I don't know what this guy is spiking his kool-aid with... Clames Jun 2012 #9
Gun culture has been telling us there is no "loophole" (I guess because they use it or might). Hoyt Jun 2012 #10
It's not a loophole -- it's a prohibition. Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #15
Plenty do stick it in their pants. And, most sellers who don't check Back Ground just want cash. Hoyt Jun 2012 #18
"most sellers who don't check Back Ground" Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #19
All they have to do is go through FFL. It costs $35 or so. So pay it next time you sell a gun Hoyt Jun 2012 #20
Maybe where you are it's $35, but not here Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #21
The problem with letting anyone use NICS is that one can check on their neighbor. You might only Hoyt Jun 2012 #22
How about this: Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #23
It has been my opinion and will continue to be that ... spin Jun 2012 #12
There is only one way to close the "loophole - universal licensing. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #16
As a Virginia resadent, and political activist.. virginia mountainman Jun 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Law enforcement officials...»Reply #0