Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Oral Arguments in Illinois Carry Case (Shepard v. Madigan) [View all]ileus
(15,396 posts)35. Let's hope this removes power from the 1% and restores it to the 99%
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Since Heller/McDonald, criminalizing them is going to require a Constitutional amendment
Glaug-Eldare
Jun 2012
#4
Do you think Obama will appoint justices that disagree with his stated position? n/t
TPaine7
Jun 2012
#6
So, is it your position that our president, who took the same path, also devolved?!
TPaine7
Jun 2012
#19
I do hope that you mean to ban ALL GUNS...no military, no police. NO GUNS FOR ANYONE AT ALL
Tuesday Afternoon
Jun 2012
#79
So when you changed from sharesunited, was it evolution, devolution or metamorphosis?
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#40
Obama has evolved on this issue, just like many here and wants to leave the issue alone.
ProgressiveProfessor
Jun 2012
#42
And in McDonald, Stevens cited the absurd Cruikshank decision as his rationale
Glaug-Eldare
Jun 2012
#8
If textual analysis has any validity at all, DUer Loudly is in fact, former DUer sharesunited.
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#71
So what about all the people who saved their lives or the lived of loved ones with guns and ammo?
Atypical Liberal
Jun 2012
#39