Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: "More powerful," "less powerful," assault, non-assault - can all of you PLEASE take a breath? [View all]EX500rider
(10,891 posts)42. OOOOHHHH!!!!!
I so want the 10/22/Mg42 make-over kit now!! lol
My 10/22 has the folding stock kit right now but that is so much cooler..
Just needs a bipod...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"More powerful," "less powerful," assault, non-assault - can all of you PLEASE take a breath? [View all]
derby378
Apr 2012
OP
The Remmy and the 50/70 cartridge were both used by Buffalo hunters, back in the day.
oneshooter
Apr 2012
#11
I agree. I don't understand the attempt to squirm away from what these weapons are.
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#14
Just to prove your point, you are confusing "assault rifle" with "assault weapon".
ManiacJoe
Apr 2012
#15
"I don't like all the semantic wrangling over what is and what isn't an "assault rifle". That fight
ellisonz
Apr 2012
#17
It might not be 6.8 SPC, but 3x the speed of sound is nothing to sneeze at (n/t)
derby378
Apr 2012
#35