Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: How Military Guns Make the Civilian Market [View all]flamin lib
(14,559 posts)30. Is that a technical term? Not seen it in any of the publications I've read.
In fact that is the reasoning used by Kleck to dismiss the NCVS when it conflicted with his conclusions. It's also the chief issue other researchers take with Kleck. Anecdotal evidence can't be verified and should be suspect.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Stun guns, water pistols, nail guns, glue guns, air guns, toy guns, bb guns?
Starboard Tack
Jul 2014
#3
So you're saying that nearly every gun in the civilian market was designed specifically for killing
flamin lib
Jul 2014
#4
I believe, along with a number of NRA tactical instructors, that the majority
flamin lib
Jul 2014
#13
I've asked my colleagues the same thing because I've seen this claptrap before,
IronGate
Jul 2014
#25
Funny, I sent you a list pages long with publications which you claimed to have "read them all"
flamin lib
Jul 2014
#55
That's as ridiculous as saying anyone choosing to not carry WANTS to be a victim.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#43
Like the Cialis daily users they just want to be ready when the moment's right. nt
flamin lib
Jul 2014
#23
You just don't get it do you? You don't even try to get it, it seems. Don't want to get it.
NYC_SKP
Jul 2014
#21