Gun Control & RKBA

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)

19. Using a disabled person to push their agenda.

Reply to hack89 (Original post)

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 05:13 PM

Apr 2013

Stay classy, gun nuts.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Disabled Group Serves First Lawsuit Against Gun Control Law [View all] hack89 Apr 2013 OP

sorry disabled people but if you are not part of a well regulated militia you have no gun rights.... bowens43 Apr 2013 #1

The Supreme Court would disagree with you on that one. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #2

This is astroturfing, the "group" is one guy who incorporated on Wednesday, yes, really CreekDog Apr 2013 #24

I was addressing the miltia comment. hack89 Apr 2013 #25

Actually, without "standing" and just one guy and dubious claims of standing, he may not have it CreekDog Apr 2013 #26

Of course he has standing hack89 Apr 2013 #27

Stay classy ... Straw Man Apr 2013 #10

What other rights would you take away from disabled people? CokeMachine Apr 2013 #11

this group isn't for disabled people's rights, it's to protect a gun CreekDog Apr 2013 #13

Protect a gun from what? clffrdjk Apr 2013 #34

How exactly would there ever be a militia fredzachmane Apr 2013 #46

What a golden opportunity for gun manufacturers to make something for sinkingfeeling Apr 2013 #3

They do - they are called AR-15s. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #4

Wow, who knew that an AR-15 was designed just for the disabled? I sinkingfeeling Apr 2013 #5

Any weapon designed for the disabled would have the same features of an AR-15 hack89 Apr 2013 #6

A disabled friend of mine recently purchased an AR-15 Pullo Apr 2013 #39

You should see the rigs quadriplegic folks use when hunting Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #7

Yep. The AR works great in shooting systems designed for people with high-level spinal injuries Pullo Apr 2013 #40

Has to be better than the Rem 742 in .30 06 I saw for a rig... Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #47

This will go....... exactly nowhere! Ridiculous! nt rdharma Apr 2013 #8

Are you 100% sure about that? premium Apr 2013 #9

doesn't appear to be a major disabled advocacy group, but a brand new group CreekDog Apr 2013 #12

and? gejohnston Apr 2013 #14

don't lecture me since you've never posted on the disabled as a topic until a gun issue came up CreekDog Apr 2013 #15

who is lecturing? gejohnston Apr 2013 #16

WOW. beevul Apr 2013 #17

if you can explain where I have done that I'd be happy to apologize CreekDog Apr 2013 #18

Are... beevul Apr 2013 #28

I always advocated for children, am I supposed to stop because of Newtown? CreekDog Apr 2013 #35

Oh, I'm sure. beevul Apr 2013 #36

Using a disabled person to push their agenda. mwrguy Apr 2013 #19

You just exploded my irony meter. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #20

the people advocating for gun control always advocated for children CreekDog Apr 2013 #37

Because we oppose ineffective feel good laws hack89 Apr 2013 #38

what care about children, when have you posted in favor of them? CreekDog Apr 2013 #41

Why do I have to post about children to prove I care about them? hack89 Apr 2013 #42

nice try, advocating for children in general is not the same as loving your own children CreekDog Apr 2013 #43

So you can show where I have actually posted in opposition to children? hack89 Apr 2013 #44

Such a disconnect. beevul Apr 2013 #45

A) Transparent astroturf. But more importantly, B) the defendant has shown no actual harm. Robb Apr 2013 #21

re: "the defendant has shown no actual harm." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2013 #22

Corporations can sue for civil rights in certain circumstances hack89 Apr 2013 #23

Interesting. Robb Apr 2013 #30

Time will tell. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #33

re: "the defendant has shown no actual harm." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2013 #29

Have you been drinking? Robb Apr 2013 #31

Yes I have. I had coffee an hour ago... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2013 #32