Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)Does Dorner have a .50 cal sniper rifle? Did he buy it legally before he turned "bad"? [View all]
If the answer is yes and yes, then why should anyone be allowed to own such a dangerous long-range weapon?
What legitimate purpose do these things have - except to kill at long ranges and penetrate body armor?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
32 replies, 9699 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does Dorner have a .50 cal sniper rifle? Did he buy it legally before he turned "bad"? [View all]
jpak
Feb 2013
OP
let us face it. all guns have a legitmate purpose to do damage, whether it is for good or bad
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2013
#6
Then again he probably can't tote it that far and has a fraction of the ammunition he would have
iiibbb
Feb 2013
#12
And you can buy 50 cal tracer fire and take down a plane or a helicopter too. What fun!
applegrove
Feb 2013
#16
60 minutes did a story on it a decade ago. I didn't know they had tightened up
applegrove
Feb 2013
#19