Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: DC v Heller [View all]S_B_Jackson
(906 posts)4. It is up to the state to articulate a compelling state interest in the prohibition of a civil right
It is not incumbent upon the citizenry to have to present any explanation for their free excercise of their civil liberties/rights.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The need to carry a gun in public should also be based on facts and not irrational fears.
SecularMotion
Jan 2012
#3
It is up to the state to articulate a compelling state interest in the prohibition of a civil right
S_B_Jackson
Jan 2012
#4
Again, please point out where in the article it mentioned that the shooter had a CCW.
Glassunion
Jan 2012
#26
Now when you find someone who claims that no ccw holder will ever do anything wrong..
X_Digger
Jan 2012
#33
How about.. "the need to protest should also be based on facts".. "the need to pray.."
X_Digger
Jan 2012
#10