Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: This sort of thing IS the reason the MSM has ZERO credibility when it comes to guns. [View all]iiibbb
(1,448 posts)55. you've posted as much or more snark
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This sort of thing IS the reason the MSM has ZERO credibility when it comes to guns. [View all]
virginia mountainman
Jan 2013
OP
How much? Must they know the optimal barrel-twist for .308 150 grain ammo at 225 yards?
Scuba
Jan 2013
#5
Clueless? The text was correct. It was just pointing to the wrong part of the image.
BlueStreak
Jan 2013
#7
I can get a hell of a good look at a T-Bone steak by sticking my head up a bull's ass,
Ed Suspicious
Jan 2013
#16
Exactly. Grenades are illegal, and we almost never see them used for murder.
BlueStreak
Jan 2013
#23
So why the focus on a bayonet lug... and on top of that misinforming people about it.
iiibbb
Jan 2013
#34
Nobody cares, but you will if a law is passed that isn't specific in terms and terminology.
shadowrider
Jan 2013
#69
At least the words "Ban all Firearms" is an idea that is clear and not irrelevant as "bayonet lugs"
iiibbb
Jan 2013
#49
So what you're saying is, that's actually the shoulder thing? I'm confused: I thought
petronius
Jan 2013
#17
part of the problem is that gun lovers think it makes a difference to the cause of
samsingh
Jan 2013
#26
this is why the gun fetishists have ZERO credibility when it comes to guns.....
bowens43
Jan 2013
#28
It matters because it creates confusion and impedes the efforts of sensible gun control.
iiibbb
Jan 2013
#38
And thus the extent of your empathy toward the young victims is now fully known.
villager
Jan 2013
#37
More gun nut fail: I'm trying to prevent the next batch of victims. You prefer easily available
villager
Jan 2013
#40
You don't know what I prefer except that people use correct words in order to craft laws.
iiibbb
Jan 2013
#43
Quit pretending you support any kind of law that would reduce the availability of military-grade
villager
Jan 2013
#47
Aside from your public snark and stalking at websites like this? You mean, you're doing it
villager
Jan 2013
#51
Are there others who respond with as little regard for the victims of mass shootings as you?
villager
Jan 2013
#73
My main concern is that any law that is written in a way that actually solves problems
iiibbb
Jan 2013
#74
I would say when push comes to shove, they always care about their political sponsors first
villager
Jan 2013
#76
One rarely finds this level of moral posturing outside of antiabortion protests.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2013
#78
No matter that "military style weapons" kill less that 100 people a year in the USA.
Ashgrey77
Jan 2013
#66
to be fair, it wouldn't hurt the cause if the media would do just a little bit of research..
frylock
Jan 2013
#33