Gun Control & RKBA

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)

9. I partly agree with it, and partly disagree.

Reply to 2ndAmForComputers (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 10:25 PM

Jan 2013

I agree with the core message -- that it's hypocritical for wealthy gun control advocates to place their children in schools with armed guard while demanding that no armed security be available for the 99%'s kids. It does say to me that they consider their children more valuable and worthy of protection than ours. NRA should've made it clearer that they aren't talking about the Secret Service -- they're talking about private security guards hired by elite private schools.

As for the "blah blah tax and spend liberals blah blah" Republican crap, it makes me glad I'm not paying Norquist and Nugent anymore.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So. What are the opinions of this distinguished forum about the Exceedingly Honorable NRA's ad [View all] 2ndAmForComputers Jan 2013 OP

This should be interesting liberal N proud Jan 2013 #1

I have not seen it yet, do you have a link for me? nt ZombieHorde Jan 2013 #2

Here 2ndAmForComputers Jan 2013 #3

Thanks! nt ZombieHorde Jan 2013 #7

I saw a couple of excerpts while I had "Rachel" on in the background krispos42 Jan 2013 #4

It has sunk them to a new low. Dung beetles are above them. appleannie1 Jan 2013 #5

Haven't seen it. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2013 #6

I don't need to see it. defacto7 Jan 2013 #8

I partly agree with it, and partly disagree. Glaug-Eldare Jan 2013 #9

"NRA should've made it clearer ..." tosh Jan 2013 #12

Pretty stupid if it was. Glaug-Eldare Jan 2013 #13

The Presidents children need protection from more than guns. liberal N proud Jan 2013 #16

It would have been a stronger message Glaug-Eldare Jan 2013 #18

The proved they are despicable. liberal N proud Jan 2013 #19

What's despicable about it, besides "BLAH SCARY LIBERALS?" Glaug-Eldare Jan 2013 #20

The Obama girls security is not the Presidents choice liberal N proud Jan 2013 #31

Outside of the Secret Service, it is. Glaug-Eldare Jan 2013 #33

That would seem to indicate... NewMoonTherian Jan 2013 #24

If your child was kidnapped, it would be a terrible thing, but would it jeopardize national security? liberal N proud Jan 2013 #28

It's hypocritical and disgusting. Shrike47 Jan 2013 #10

They aren't complaining because his children are protected. NewMoonTherian Jan 2013 #25

cheap shots on obamas kids jimmy the one Jan 2013 #26

Go back to Meta, son. sylvi Jan 2013 #11

The fact that I am not your son fills me with joy. 2ndAmForComputers Jan 2013 #15

You know sylvi Jan 2013 #21

Please tell me in which way the OP question is not serious. 2ndAmForComputers Jan 2013 #35

Please enlighten me... Blue_Tires Apr 2013 #37

Did you just call someone "SON?" Blue_Tires Apr 2013 #36

Sure did. sylvi Apr 2013 #39

Typically skeezy. rrneck Jan 2013 #14

It didn't live up to some of the hype I have read. ZombieHorde Jan 2013 #17

Quakers, Friends jimmy the one Jan 2013 #22

44,000 death threats to obama; me? you? none jimmy the one Jan 2013 #23

I signed a petition to the NRA against this ad HockeyMom Jan 2013 #27

You are not alone, hockey mom jimmy the one Jan 2013 #30

personally, I don't have a problem with making our schools at least as secure as our airports. bubbayugga Jan 2013 #29

And what if Romney had won and the Secret Service had to cover his 5 sons? rightsideout Jan 2013 #32

The Obamas selected a school for their children Glaug-Eldare Jan 2013 #34

Haven't seen it, therefore, no opinion. N/T GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #38