Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 02:36 AM Dec 2011

Does this group need a permanent host? [View all]

From Skinner's post on group hosts:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1013434

If your group plays host to open debate on a particular topic, and welcomes a wide range of viewpoints, then the choice might not be so simple. If you select a Host, it needs to be someone who is trusted to be fair by people holding a wide range of viewpoints. You may decide that it is better not to assign anyone as the Host of your group, to avoid the risk that that person might use their power to benefit a particular viewpoint.

This group is not non-controversial and it is alson not a safe haven. Is there a need for a permanent host and is there anyone that can gain the trust of both sides?

Probably the best thing to do is to first explain why you think the group could benefit from either having or not having a permanent host, and then if you think we do need one, nominate someone from the other side of the aisle. If we can only nominate someone who agrees with us, then I'd say that was a strong argument for having no permanent host.

Remember, unlike forum hosts, group hosts have no term limit. This could be a lifetime post.

Here are the superpowers of a group host:

Group Hosts have the following abilities in their assigned groups:

•Lock thread (Reason: Violates this forum's Statement of Purpose)
Locks a thread when the OP is not on-topic for the group. An automatic notification will be dropped into the OP explaining why the thread was locked. The thread can only be unlocked by the Host who locked it.


•Lock thread (Reason not specified)
Locks a thread for an unspecified reason. An automatic notification will be dropped into the OP, but no reason for the lock will be provided. The thread can only be unlocked by the Host who locked it.


•Pin & lock thread
Pins a thread to the top of the group and simultaneously locks it. An automatic notification will be dropped into the OP, but no reason for the lock will be provided. The thread can be unpinned by any Host, but can only be unlocked by the Host who locked it.


•Pin thread
Pins a thread to the top of the group, where it will remain until it is unpinned. The thread can be unpinned by any Host.


•Block a member from the group
Blocks a member from posting in the group. The member will be automatically notified by DU Mail. Members can be unblocked by any Host.


•Make a member a Host of the group
Creates a new group Host. The selected member will be automatically notified by DU Mail. Members can only be removed as a Host by Hosts who are listed above them in the hierarchy.


•Remove a Host of the group
Removes a Host. Hosts can only remove Hosts who are listed below them in the hierarchy

Is there anyone on the other side of the aisle from you that you would trust to be on the top of the hierarchy?

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If we cannot decide on a permanent host, we'll need to ask an admin to unsticky the threads on top Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #1
Not in my opinion. nt Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #2
I think there are functions that only Hosts can do that are beneficial. Make7 Dec 2011 #3
Hi, I'm here. eomer Dec 2011 #11
Well, it still remains to be seen how the conversations develop here. Make7 Dec 2011 #26
I could see Grateful for Hope as a permanent host. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #4
Hi Bolo Grateful for Hope Dec 2011 #12
I think you both would make good hosts maddezmom Dec 2011 #13
Of course if either Lithos or undergroundrailroad (or both) were to put their hats into the ring Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #5
that sounds like a great idea maddezmom Dec 2011 #22
I think it's too early to be certain. greyl Dec 2011 #6
Oh, definitely. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #9
I think this group needs a few hosts maddezmom Dec 2011 #7
Yeah, when/if the time comes, at least 6 would be nice. nt greyl Dec 2011 #8
Agree with multiple hosts canetoad Dec 2011 #15
Yes. And I nominate you..nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #10
Yes, there should be hosts for this group Lithos Dec 2011 #14
I think this is the consensus. Anyone who feels otherwise, please speak up. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #16
My two cents... I suggest Bolo and Spooked Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #17
I'd be worried about assigning someone whose DU2 posts frequently clearly violated DU3's TOS. nt greyl Dec 2011 #20
Come on... Bolo was never that bad... Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #25
Probably not a good idea. canoeist52 Dec 2011 #18
If a group has no host, a thread CAN be alerted on. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2011 #19
Adding DUer known as noise to the "ballot". nt greyl Dec 2011 #21
If ever a group needed hosts this group would be my pick because.. Little Star Dec 2011 #23
I nominate you Bolo. Little Star Dec 2011 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Does this group need a pe...»Reply #0