Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
57. It's still too vague and leaves the door wide open. Here's Abbas admitting...
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:20 AM
Mar 2012

...that he never gave Olmert a number. From my last post with a link to al-Jazeera's papers:

President Abbas goes on to explain that in his meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
“on refugees” he did not specify a number, but rather:
we said some but not all would return to what is now Israel. (Id.)


Here it is in detail by AM (Abu Mazen aka Abbas):

AM: We discussed all issues and asked all questions in our meetings. For example, on borders, we asked, “what are the borders? Give us maps.” We did not receive an answer until 3 months before the end of negotiations and until Rice said that the 1967 is the baseline. They showed us but did not give us a map. They said 6.5% of the territory for swaps, we said only 1.9% and that is when the built up area of all the settlements is only 1.2%. That issue, had it been addressed and resolved, would have solved all three issues of borders, settlements, and Jerusalem. On refugees, we said some but not all would return to what is now Israel. All refugees can get Palestinian citizenship (all 5 million) if they want to (for example Palestinian refugees in Jordan may not want to while for refugees in Lebanon there is a need). With that Palestinian refugees will no longer be stateless but rather foreigners.


That was in March 2009, months after Olmert's final offer and a few weeks into Netanyahu's term.

Where's this 150,000 number coming from when Abbas admitted he never specified any number?

With that Palestinian refugees will no longer be stateless but rather foreigners.


He's admitting Palestinian refugees will remain in limbo, b/c Palestine won't accept them as anything other than foreigners. The point being, millions of Palestinians are potential returnees to Israel due his proposal being so vague.

Realize also that in the paper you just provided about 150,000 refugees that one of the requirements by the PLO is that each of the 5-7 million refugees has an individual RoR that cannot be negotiated away. How do you circle the square on that one?

Put it all together and the PLO is blowing smoke and playing games. They're still holding out for 2 states becoming 1 state. Same shit for the past 60+ years.

[font color = "red"]ETA in summary:

1. You believe 150,000 would remain a set figure. But Abbas said 'some, not all'.

2. What happens to the other millions of Palestinians whose individual rights (meaning they get to choose) cannot be negotiated away?

3. How about the possible millions of refugees who become foreigners in a future Palestine? They'll still be considered refugees according to the PLO.
[/font]
Obama bad, but not even mentioned in your excerpt? babylonsister Mar 2012 #1
Kow Tow to the Repugs? bahrbearian Mar 2012 #3
actually the article starts with that Enrique Mar 2012 #4
A lot of people do not consider J-Street 'pro-Israel. King_David Mar 2012 #20
So "deflating Republican attacks" is more important than standing agaisnt injustice? Ken Burch Mar 2012 #51
Oh goodie we get to go to war , Because Obama didn't want to hurt Bibis little feeling bahrbearian Mar 2012 #2
#1, we won't stop giving $ to Israel. #2, do you really think we/Obama wants babylonsister Mar 2012 #5
I don't bluff ! bahrbearian Mar 2012 #6
"Obama urges Israel to give diplomacy a chance with Iran in AIPAC speech" babylonsister Mar 2012 #8
we have 8 months separating us from the election azurnoir Mar 2012 #7
I would not be so sure about that ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #15
What in your would Iran have to do to be "stupid enough" to justify a war azurnoir Mar 2012 #16
Mine the Straights comes to mind ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #19
So you, Beinart, and your political allies believe that it's okay.... shira Mar 2012 #9
shira once again Olmert himself says that Abbas did not refuse Olmert "stepped away" from being PM azurnoir Mar 2012 #10
Big deal. Did Abbas counter with anything reasonable at all, or did he just quietly walk away? shira Mar 2012 #11
shira the OP states that Abbas and Erekat tried to give the current PM and his rep azurnoir Mar 2012 #13
You're now avoiding the Olmert proposal w/Abbas' lack of a counter-offer.... shira Mar 2012 #22
why will Israel not extend or even discuss it now? why the now you see it now you don't? azurnoir Mar 2012 #28
Stop. Now you're dredging up your past failed attempts to dismiss Olmert's offer. shira Mar 2012 #30
my only supposed "failure" here azurnoir Mar 2012 #33
Great, so you can't defend the past. We all know that already... shira Mar 2012 #34
keep trying however azurnoir Mar 2012 #35
Yeah, right. You've got nothing. n/t shira Mar 2012 #38
its not what I don't its what I still have azurnoir Mar 2012 #41
Now you're talking... shira Mar 2012 #47
well a couple of things here first Livni who was the front running candidate for Kadima did not azurnoir Mar 2012 #48
Why is the response to Olmert's "offer" more important than the offers Abbas & Co. made recently? Ken Burch Mar 2012 #53
Again, why is the Olmert offer more important than the more recent PA offers that azur mentioned? Ken Burch Mar 2012 #54
Ken, read the above exchange again. My point is that the PA has never once... shira Mar 2012 #56
once Livni and then Bibi were in power, what was the point? Ken Burch Mar 2012 #52
I think we really need a sticky on this board... shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #12
There's a smilie I've been trying to figure out for the longest azurnoir Mar 2012 #14
This post is total BS oberliner Mar 2012 #17
Your post is total BS... shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #24
Further shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #26
If Abbas made an offer, what was the number of refugees.... shira Mar 2012 #31
The Palestine Papers speak of a "very low number" and a "symbolic number" shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #36
Please show me where Abbas and Olmert agreed to some small number of refugees. n/t shira Mar 2012 #40
More BS on top of BS. Who do you think you're fooling? shira Mar 2012 #23
re Refugees and Settlements shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #25
The first link you provided is from Jan 2010. You realize that's well after Olmert? shira Mar 2012 #29
Bullshit. The discussions took place in June, 2008 shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #37
The top of that link says Sept 2010. And it refers to Senator Mitchell... shira Mar 2012 #39
According to Saeb Erekat, the Palestinians' starting position in June 2008 was 150,000... shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #42
Those numbers are still vague due to a renewable right... shira Mar 2012 #49
Yeah, renewable only upon agreement with Israel shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #50
It's still too vague and leaves the door wide open. Here's Abbas admitting... shira Mar 2012 #57
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #55
Long Awaited! Seminal! Excellent Read! oberliner Mar 2012 #18
LOL nt King_David Mar 2012 #21
Well, someone seems bitter today... shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #27
I guess me and you have very different taste in men ... King_David Mar 2012 #32
You're just jealous because you couldn't get him in a million years (nt) shaayecanaan Mar 2012 #43
nope, not my type,wouldn' even try. King_David Mar 2012 #44
And you know this ? King_David Mar 2012 #45
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #46
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #58
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #59
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Peter Beinart: Obama Betr...»Reply #57