Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Peter Beinart: Obama Betrayed Ideals on Israel (excellent read) [View all]shira
(30,109 posts)57. It's still too vague and leaves the door wide open. Here's Abbas admitting...
...that he never gave Olmert a number. From my last post with a link to al-Jazeera's papers:
President Abbas goes on to explain that in his meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
on refugees he did not specify a number, but rather:
we said some but not all would return to what is now Israel. (Id.)
Here it is in detail by AM (Abu Mazen aka Abbas):
AM: We discussed all issues and asked all questions in our meetings. For example, on borders, we asked, what are the borders? Give us maps. We did not receive an answer until 3 months before the end of negotiations and until Rice said that the 1967 is the baseline. They showed us but did not give us a map. They said 6.5% of the territory for swaps, we said only 1.9% and that is when the built up area of all the settlements is only 1.2%. That issue, had it been addressed and resolved, would have solved all three issues of borders, settlements, and Jerusalem. On refugees, we said some but not all would return to what is now Israel. All refugees can get Palestinian citizenship (all 5 million) if they want to (for example Palestinian refugees in Jordan may not want to while for refugees in Lebanon there is a need). With that Palestinian refugees will no longer be stateless but rather foreigners.
That was in March 2009, months after Olmert's final offer and a few weeks into Netanyahu's term.
Where's this 150,000 number coming from when Abbas admitted he never specified any number?
With that Palestinian refugees will no longer be stateless but rather foreigners.
He's admitting Palestinian refugees will remain in limbo, b/c Palestine won't accept them as anything other than foreigners. The point being, millions of Palestinians are potential returnees to Israel due his proposal being so vague.
Realize also that in the paper you just provided about 150,000 refugees that one of the requirements by the PLO is that each of the 5-7 million refugees has an individual RoR that cannot be negotiated away. How do you circle the square on that one?
Put it all together and the PLO is blowing smoke and playing games. They're still holding out for 2 states becoming 1 state. Same shit for the past 60+ years.
[font color = "red"]ETA in summary:
1. You believe 150,000 would remain a set figure. But Abbas said 'some, not all'.
2. What happens to the other millions of Palestinians whose individual rights (meaning they get to choose) cannot be negotiated away?
3. How about the possible millions of refugees who become foreigners in a future Palestine? They'll still be considered refugees according to the PLO.[/font]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So "deflating Republican attacks" is more important than standing agaisnt injustice?
Ken Burch
Mar 2012
#51
Oh goodie we get to go to war , Because Obama didn't want to hurt Bibis little feeling
bahrbearian
Mar 2012
#2
#1, we won't stop giving $ to Israel. #2, do you really think we/Obama wants
babylonsister
Mar 2012
#5
shira once again Olmert himself says that Abbas did not refuse Olmert "stepped away" from being PM
azurnoir
Mar 2012
#10
Big deal. Did Abbas counter with anything reasonable at all, or did he just quietly walk away?
shira
Mar 2012
#11
shira the OP states that Abbas and Erekat tried to give the current PM and his rep
azurnoir
Mar 2012
#13
why will Israel not extend or even discuss it now? why the now you see it now you don't?
azurnoir
Mar 2012
#28
Stop. Now you're dredging up your past failed attempts to dismiss Olmert's offer.
shira
Mar 2012
#30
well a couple of things here first Livni who was the front running candidate for Kadima did not
azurnoir
Mar 2012
#48
Why is the response to Olmert's "offer" more important than the offers Abbas & Co. made recently?
Ken Burch
Mar 2012
#53
Again, why is the Olmert offer more important than the more recent PA offers that azur mentioned?
Ken Burch
Mar 2012
#54
Please show me where Abbas and Olmert agreed to some small number of refugees. n/t
shira
Mar 2012
#40
The first link you provided is from Jan 2010. You realize that's well after Olmert?
shira
Mar 2012
#29
According to Saeb Erekat, the Palestinians' starting position in June 2008 was 150,000...
shaayecanaan
Mar 2012
#42