Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
26. 1000+plus delegates in 1988 was NOT an "abysmal failure"
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 10:06 PM
Mar 2012

(blowing a 17-point lead by refusing to fight back against smear campaigns, as Dukakis did and had no excuse for doing, IS an abysmal failure...especially since we were told, over and over again "it HAS to be Dukakis...he's ELECTABLE" all through 1988).

And The "Hymietown" thing was just one meaningless word spoken by a tired guy at the end of the day. IT's trivial compared to Lyndon Johnson having to be taught how to say "Negro&quot I doubt Jesse actually said the Nixon thing). Furthermore, the "Hymietown" thing(which he shouldn't have said but which isn't that big a deal compared to what black people have had to endure from the white politicians they've supported over the years)was infinitesmally unimportant compared to Reagan's insistence on bullying the Senate into approving the sale of the AWACS surveillance planes to the Saudis...planes the Saudis used almost certainly, we can assume, to surveill Israeli defense installations).

Jesse's position on the I/P dispute was for two states...the position everybody, INCLUDING the Israelis, knew was the only realistic solution, yet it was the position that the Israeli government demonized as "anti-Israel" and the position that Israeli apologists insisted at the time was tantamount to antisemitism. They KNEW they were wrong to do that, and they did it anyway. It makes the currently stated Israeli government support for a two-state solution completely cynical and bogus. They should have accepted the need for two-states from the start, since they always knew it was going to be impossible to get peace and recognition from the Arab world without it.

At this point in history, a two-state solution is wishful thinking. redgreenandblue Mar 2012 #1
Too bad... holdencaufield Mar 2012 #2
The Jews aren't going away. The Arabs aren't either. redgreenandblue Mar 2012 #3
Israel... holdencaufield Mar 2012 #4
Wasn't the initial idea behind the partitioning to create "two states for two peoples"? redgreenandblue Mar 2012 #5
What's with this map nonsense and not enough territory for an independent Palestinian state? shira Mar 2012 #6
Would have, could have, should have. In the end it doesn't matter "whose fault" it was. redgreenandblue Mar 2012 #7
Obviously it does matter whose fault it is to you... shira Mar 2012 #12
I think that's an excellent summation. Pretty much exactly how I see the situation. Crunchy Frog Mar 2012 #8
really? Shaktimaan Mar 2012 #9
Until the late 80's, Israel anathemized anybody who dared suggest Ken Burch Mar 2012 #13
Two states was nice in theory back in the early/mid 80's but impractical... shira Mar 2012 #14
Israel had been occupying the West Bank since 1967 azurnoir Mar 2012 #16
So what? Again, what could Israel have offered in terms of a homeland... shira Mar 2012 #17
uh....freedom? Ken Burch Mar 2012 #21
uh.........what about land for peace? You're saying all you want... shira Mar 2012 #23
It was never legitimate to expect West Bank Palestinians to have to be Jordanians Ken Burch Mar 2012 #25
Another strawman. You must be talking to yourself b/c I never mentioned that... shira Mar 2012 #28
You were the one who just brought up Jordan. Ken Burch Mar 2012 #29
right. Shaktimaan Mar 2012 #31
Ken, I brought up Jordan and you made up a strawman rather than discuss this intelligently. n/t shira Mar 2012 #33
esse Jackson was driven out of politics for supporting what Netanyahu claims to support now... holdencaufield Mar 2012 #24
1000+plus delegates in 1988 was NOT an "abysmal failure" Ken Burch Mar 2012 #26
while a 2 state solution is still the preferred option by most Israeli Jews and Palestinians azurnoir Mar 2012 #10
Please, be real shira Mar 2012 #11
Olmerts offer lol do you really want to there-again? azurnoir Mar 2012 #15
Abbas definitely refused the offer. To this day, he still says the gaps were too wide... shira Mar 2012 #18
here in Olmerts own words azurnoir Mar 2012 #19
Oh sure, never formally rejected.... shira Mar 2012 #20
who would Abbas have made a "counter offer" to? Olmert resigned shortly after making the offer azurnoir Mar 2012 #22
To Olmert, immediately. Let the world know that, like Sadat, he is serious about peace... shira Mar 2012 #27
Olmert was a bit too busy resigning and and perhaps addressing corruption charges at the time azurnoir Mar 2012 #30
Abbas has never been commited to genuine peace. Deal with it. shira Mar 2012 #32
well that is your opinion but it would seem azurnoir Mar 2012 #34
I remain dedicated to a peaceful 2 state resolution, unlike yourself... shira Mar 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»AIPAC, Israel, and the Hy...»Reply #26