Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Israel, the un-apartheid state – a comparison with Australia [View all]pelsar
(12,283 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 27, 2013, 10:02 AM - Edit history (4)
Chinas version in Tibet of two legal systems is that both are civil (which is actually closer to that of S.Africa in the past)
And in N. Cyprus....
Turkey racially discrimates against Greek Cypriots by preventing them from returning to their homes and lands, whereas turks can settle there, amongst other things
what happened the west sahara and morocco? you've got settlers, wall, military occupation....but no apartheid?
and our Cuban born US marine.....is he subject to the same laws that the cubans are? or to the laws that the americans are....his citizenship is american, but his blood and race are cuban.
____________________________
so your saying that though the above examples have two legal systems (military and civilian) for different citizens living in the same area, and but they are not Apartheid
whereas israel, also having two legal system for different citizenships in the same area is....
did i get that right?
(if i understand your definition....its states that apartheid can only exist if of the two legal systems, one is military and the other civilian, except for morocco which although it does in fact have a military occupation of west sahara and it has military and civilian laws for different people, its still not considered apartheid)