Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: I would like to see an explanation of why water flowing thru/from Fukushima is bad [View all]FBaggins
(26,731 posts)32. Hillarious
Here's a recent one that's relevant to the current conversation:
Must have escaped the NIOT (nuclear industry obstruction team).
http://www.meti.go.jp/english/earthquake/nuclear/decommissioning/pdf/20130822_01.pdf
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I would like to see an explanation of why water flowing thru/from Fukushima is bad [View all]
phantom power
Aug 2013
OP
and I am sure that if you are really interested, you can find the answers to all those questions.
niyad
Aug 2013
#1
wow--NOT ONE actual, scientific article giving the information you specifically requested? that is
niyad
Aug 2013
#16
the thing is, I'm not asking anybody to take Tepco's (or BP's) word for anything.
phantom power
Aug 2013
#27
Just who the hell do you think is OBSTRUCTING comprehensive and effective monitoring...
kristopher
Aug 2013
#29
There are 1.3x10^22 Becquerels of tritium in the ocean. 13 billion trillion.
phantom power
Aug 2013
#7
40 trilliion Bq of tritium diluted in 10 cubic kilometers of sea water gives an increase of 4 Bq/L.
GliderGuider
Aug 2013
#25
I've been wondering the same thing, but never had the balls to ask the question in this place.
GliderGuider
Aug 2013
#17