Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CRH

(1,553 posts)
5. Couldn't resist joe, to wish a good morning, ...
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:20 PM
Nov 2012

we would miss you not immediately contesting the dissolution of civilization or even possible extinction. If you didn't, I'd begin to worry for your health.

Most scientists don't have a problem with the facts, its making an unfettered assessment that allows realistic interpretation. Look at what has happened since 2000. Aren't most past assumptions of the facts now being proven to be underestimation? If you always look for the weakest predictions and print this as mainstream cool aid, who does that serve if it latter turns out to influence policy or the lack thereof?

Later

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Wigley and Santer Find th...»Reply #5