Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:23 PM Nov 2012

PETM V 2.0 - PriceWaterhouse Study Finds Avoiding 6C Increase By 2100 "Almost Impossible" [View all]

The world is destined for dangerous climate change this century – with global temperatures possibly rising by as much as 6C – because of the failure of governments to find alternatives to fossil fuels, a report by a group of economists has concluded.

It will now be almost impossible to keep the increase in global average temperatures up to 2100 within the 2C target that scientists believe might avert dangerous and unpredictable climate change, according to a study by the accountancy giant PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).

An analysis of how fast the major world economies are reducing their emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels suggests that it may already be too late to stay within the 2C target of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, it found.

To keep within the 2C target, the global economy would have to reach a "decarbonisation" rate of at least 5.1 per cent a year for the next 39 years. This has not happened since records began at the end of the Second World War, according to Leo Johnson, a PwC partner in sustainability and climate change. "Even doubling our current rate of decarbonisation would still lead to emissions consistent with 6C of warming by the end of the century. To give ourselves a more than 50 per cent chance of avoiding 2C will require a sixfold improvement in our rate of decarbonisation," he said.

EDIT

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/temperatures-may-rise-6c-by-2100-says-study-8281272.html

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Human hubris has doomed the planet. SubgeniusHasSlack Nov 2012 #1
The planet will be fine, like a snake sloughing off a skin aletier_v Nov 2012 #3
That all depends on what you call "the planet" OKIsItJustMe Nov 2012 #10
Hot?? You want hot? Take a look at that Kardashian woman... GliderGuider Nov 2012 #2
Yes, when it's so bad that even economists confirm your worst suspicions . . . hatrack Nov 2012 #4
Like a fat-cat Wall Street institution like PWC? AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #13
No, I love that they're getting involved like this. People actually listen to them. GliderGuider Nov 2012 #15
Like Wall Street bankers, for example? AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #17
Maybe like politicians. GliderGuider Nov 2012 #23
Hey Joe, you want to face up to reality, ... CRH Nov 2012 #29
Fine, but how will the job market be in this warmer economy? wtmusic Nov 2012 #5
In a warmer world, wouldn't the Kardashians wear less clothing? hatrack Nov 2012 #6
Exactly. Instead of wasting money on carbon sequestration, we should be investing in bikinis! wtmusic Nov 2012 #7
You want hot, ... tune into the intro on Sunday Night Football, ... CRH Nov 2012 #30
Hey hatrack, paint a picture of 6*C for casual readers, ... CRH Nov 2012 #8
PETM - estimated 25-30% of all species went extinct - not exactly Permian, but not fun . . . hatrack Nov 2012 #9
I think 'tool monkeys', ... will have a very hard time, ... CRH Nov 2012 #11
You greatly underestimate humanity's capability, then. AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #22
Like I said above, enjoy your high. n/t CRH Nov 2012 #26
And do enjoy your low, please. ;-) n/t AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #32
What difference does it really make? NoOneMan Nov 2012 #33
Well..... AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #34
"humanity, while not invincible, really is more resilient than some may think" NoOneMan Nov 2012 #35
It's more than a bit ironic that those with the most traditional knowledge GliderGuider Nov 2012 #36
True to an extent, but it doesn't really change things much. AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #37
Forgive me, but PriceWaterhouseCoopers? The financial giant? AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #12
Have you listened to that Anderson presentation yet? NoOneMan Nov 2012 #14
I haven't had the chance, and why couldn't you just use the DU Mail function? AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #16
Mail is a construct of sick civilization NoOneMan Nov 2012 #18
What kind of an answer is that? AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #19
I thought it was a funny one NoOneMan Nov 2012 #20
Well, I didn't think it was....sorry. =( AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #21
GG already posted it here: joshcryer Nov 2012 #24
It's not a climatological study, it's an analysis of how fast we're decarbonizing energy production hatrack Nov 2012 #27
True, I suppose. AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #31
Except, after 5-10 years of drought they will start geoengineering. joshcryer Nov 2012 #25
Yes, and once sulphate injection begins, it can't ever, ever stop hatrack Nov 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»PETM V 2.0 - PriceWaterho...»Reply #0