Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 20 March 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)29. The Spectacular Rise and Fall of Jamie Dimon, Wall Street’s Golden Boy By Lynn Stuart Parramore
http://www.alternet.org/economy/spectacular-rise-and-fall-jamie-dimon-wall-streets-golden-boy?akid=10211.227380.ngElvg&rd=1&src=newsletter811974&t=3&paging=off
They called him a hero. The most esteemed banker of his time. The captain who could steer the ship while others foundered. The handsome, charismatic CEO of JP Morgan Chase, he of the silver hair and golden tongue, beloved by presidents and praised by pundits. Now the truth is out, and Wall Streets golden boy, Jamie Dimon, has fallen to earth with a thud...Why did it take so long? Why did the American media treat him with kid gloves? In a populist moment, how did he manage to escape the scorn heaped on his colleagues?
....
Man on the Make SHORT BIO FOLLOWS
How the Mighty Have Fallen
Fast-forward to summer 2012, when it seemed that the Great Gatsby ran into Moby Dick while taking his yacht for a spin. A nasty, behemoth of a trading fuck-up dubbed the London Whale sent billions of dollars up in smoke when a hedging strategy at least thats what the bank claimed went wrong. At first, Dimon pooh-poohed the disaster as a "tempest in a teapot. Then he tried to spin it as an isolated risk management problem that had been fully addressed. Criminal investigators werent buying it, and they began to probe into the banks activities. By January 2013, Dimons pay was cut by more than half, down to $11.5 million. Even so, the banks board of directors praised Dimon for forcefully responding to the trading loss.
But praise was getting harder to come by. Around the time the pay cut was announced, Forbes magazine, hardly known for its distrust of bankers, published an article summing up the feeling about Dimon that had begun to circulate in Switzerland at the big annual convention of economic honchos held in January: Davos: How Jamie Dimon and JPMorgan Chase Endanger the Public Safety. Then came the Big Reveal. Last Thursday, a 300-page Senate report delving into the details of the $6.2 billion London Whale loss pointed the finger of blame directly at Jamie Dimon. An email containing the words I approve made it clear that the guy known for micromanagement and checking out data knew exactly what was going on at JPM. He had specifically told his people to take on riskier business and he approved new ways of hiding it...The New York Times is no longer singing Dimons praises. Gretchen Morgenson and others have been filling the business pages for the last two weeks with tales of Dimons follies and the reckless behavior of JPM. Morgenson had two words when she read the Senate report: Be afraid. For all the Dodd-Franking and the tough talk of reining in big banks, JPM, she concluded, is a ticking time-bomb rife with stupid risk-taking, bad management and a penchant for misleading investors and the public.
In the blogosphere, some put it more plainly. David Dayen, writing for Naked Capitalism, covered a report written by Joshua Rosner, an Graham-Fisher and Co. analyst (and Morgensons co-author on the book Reckless Endangerment). The title of Dayens piece told the tale: New Report Exposes JPMorgan Chase as Mostly a Criminal Enterprise. Dayen, a veteran reporter of dastardly Wall Street deeds, was aghast at the list of frauds and malfeasance covered in Rosners report, including everything from illegal flood insurance claims to auto-finance rip-offs to shifting trading losses to customer accounts. (If you can stomach it, read the full report SEE LINK.) The rise and fall of Jamie Dimon is more than simply another tawdry tale of Wall Street. It is a reflection, and a criticism, of the American experienceour beliefs, our desires, and our attitude toward the wealthy. Dimons story is about the tarnishing of the American Dream. It reveals the sham of romanticizing riches and the folly of our need to believe in the goodness of those who possess wealth...Maybe Jamie Dimon was a cut above his fellow bankers. Given the looks of that crowd, thats pretty lousy praise. Or maybe he wasnt. Maybe hes just a run-of-the-mill hustler, no better than the rest of them. He pretended to be in control of a too-big-to-manage bank and when things went awry which they always do he tried to fake his way out of trouble. This Golden Boy just got away with it longer than some.
OH, I WOULDN'T SAY IT'S THAT GLOBAL...IT'S THE ELITIST 1%.
THE KING IS DEAD, LONG LIVE THE KING!
They called him a hero. The most esteemed banker of his time. The captain who could steer the ship while others foundered. The handsome, charismatic CEO of JP Morgan Chase, he of the silver hair and golden tongue, beloved by presidents and praised by pundits. Now the truth is out, and Wall Streets golden boy, Jamie Dimon, has fallen to earth with a thud...Why did it take so long? Why did the American media treat him with kid gloves? In a populist moment, how did he manage to escape the scorn heaped on his colleagues?
....
Man on the Make SHORT BIO FOLLOWS
How the Mighty Have Fallen
Fast-forward to summer 2012, when it seemed that the Great Gatsby ran into Moby Dick while taking his yacht for a spin. A nasty, behemoth of a trading fuck-up dubbed the London Whale sent billions of dollars up in smoke when a hedging strategy at least thats what the bank claimed went wrong. At first, Dimon pooh-poohed the disaster as a "tempest in a teapot. Then he tried to spin it as an isolated risk management problem that had been fully addressed. Criminal investigators werent buying it, and they began to probe into the banks activities. By January 2013, Dimons pay was cut by more than half, down to $11.5 million. Even so, the banks board of directors praised Dimon for forcefully responding to the trading loss.
But praise was getting harder to come by. Around the time the pay cut was announced, Forbes magazine, hardly known for its distrust of bankers, published an article summing up the feeling about Dimon that had begun to circulate in Switzerland at the big annual convention of economic honchos held in January: Davos: How Jamie Dimon and JPMorgan Chase Endanger the Public Safety. Then came the Big Reveal. Last Thursday, a 300-page Senate report delving into the details of the $6.2 billion London Whale loss pointed the finger of blame directly at Jamie Dimon. An email containing the words I approve made it clear that the guy known for micromanagement and checking out data knew exactly what was going on at JPM. He had specifically told his people to take on riskier business and he approved new ways of hiding it...The New York Times is no longer singing Dimons praises. Gretchen Morgenson and others have been filling the business pages for the last two weeks with tales of Dimons follies and the reckless behavior of JPM. Morgenson had two words when she read the Senate report: Be afraid. For all the Dodd-Franking and the tough talk of reining in big banks, JPM, she concluded, is a ticking time-bomb rife with stupid risk-taking, bad management and a penchant for misleading investors and the public.
In the blogosphere, some put it more plainly. David Dayen, writing for Naked Capitalism, covered a report written by Joshua Rosner, an Graham-Fisher and Co. analyst (and Morgensons co-author on the book Reckless Endangerment). The title of Dayens piece told the tale: New Report Exposes JPMorgan Chase as Mostly a Criminal Enterprise. Dayen, a veteran reporter of dastardly Wall Street deeds, was aghast at the list of frauds and malfeasance covered in Rosners report, including everything from illegal flood insurance claims to auto-finance rip-offs to shifting trading losses to customer accounts. (If you can stomach it, read the full report SEE LINK.) The rise and fall of Jamie Dimon is more than simply another tawdry tale of Wall Street. It is a reflection, and a criticism, of the American experienceour beliefs, our desires, and our attitude toward the wealthy. Dimons story is about the tarnishing of the American Dream. It reveals the sham of romanticizing riches and the folly of our need to believe in the goodness of those who possess wealth...Maybe Jamie Dimon was a cut above his fellow bankers. Given the looks of that crowd, thats pretty lousy praise. Or maybe he wasnt. Maybe hes just a run-of-the-mill hustler, no better than the rest of them. He pretended to be in control of a too-big-to-manage bank and when things went awry which they always do he tried to fake his way out of trouble. This Golden Boy just got away with it longer than some.
OH, I WOULDN'T SAY IT'S THAT GLOBAL...IT'S THE ELITIST 1%.
THE KING IS DEAD, LONG LIVE THE KING!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Cyprus is euro zone’s very own Lehman moment: Needlessly introducing new fear chokes off bull market
Demeter
Mar 2013
#12
Verizon, Cablevision emerge as unlikely allies of cable-TV customers fed up with bundling
xchrom
Mar 2013
#11
Undoing Chavez’s Humanitarian Efforts: Will the CIA Rig the Election for Control of Venezuela’s Oil?
Demeter
Mar 2013
#23
The Spectacular Rise and Fall of Jamie Dimon, Wall Street’s Golden Boy By Lynn Stuart Parramore
Demeter
Mar 2013
#29
Too ignorant at the moment. I swear immigrant NY cab drivers have a better grasp of the world. n/t
kickysnana
Mar 2013
#56