Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Tuesday, 20 November 2012 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)32. Cameron's 'growth first' strategy shows a government running on empty
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/20/cameron-growth-first-government-empty
Several plausible reactions stalk David Cameron's pledge to put "growth first" and by implication, everything else, like people and the environment, second. Firstly, blaming regulation for holding back what would otherwise be a more dynamic economy, is a neat political distraction from the obstacle represented by the government itself. For example, clinging to George Osborne's loved but laughable strategy of "expansionary fiscal contraction" proved to be a failure.
In slashing spending within the public sphere he failed to understand the degree to which the private sector depended on it. Second, in spite of substantial public ownership of the banks, and even more substantial public financial support, the coalition has failed to make them redesign their lending strategies to support a productive economy.
By criticising the checks and balances that still apply to the market system the government pulls off a perfect political trick. It uses the strategy employed more readily by economic conservatives since the collapse and public bailout of financial markets in 2008 of using the very failure of those deregulated markets as an excuse to promote them more deeply into our lives. Evidence appears irrelevant to this case, as few in the private sector put planning problems anywhere near the top of the business snag list.
The second reaction to Cameron's comments is simply: "what's new". Even back in January 2011 the prime minister said: "It is a new year and this coalition government has one overriding resolution, and that is to help drive growth." We've heard the rhetoric of "growth first" for decades, in spite of plenty of evidence that in countries like the UK it long ago failed to deliver higher life satisfaction.
Several plausible reactions stalk David Cameron's pledge to put "growth first" and by implication, everything else, like people and the environment, second. Firstly, blaming regulation for holding back what would otherwise be a more dynamic economy, is a neat political distraction from the obstacle represented by the government itself. For example, clinging to George Osborne's loved but laughable strategy of "expansionary fiscal contraction" proved to be a failure.
In slashing spending within the public sphere he failed to understand the degree to which the private sector depended on it. Second, in spite of substantial public ownership of the banks, and even more substantial public financial support, the coalition has failed to make them redesign their lending strategies to support a productive economy.
By criticising the checks and balances that still apply to the market system the government pulls off a perfect political trick. It uses the strategy employed more readily by economic conservatives since the collapse and public bailout of financial markets in 2008 of using the very failure of those deregulated markets as an excuse to promote them more deeply into our lives. Evidence appears irrelevant to this case, as few in the private sector put planning problems anywhere near the top of the business snag list.
The second reaction to Cameron's comments is simply: "what's new". Even back in January 2011 the prime minister said: "It is a new year and this coalition government has one overriding resolution, and that is to help drive growth." We've heard the rhetoric of "growth first" for decades, in spite of plenty of evidence that in countries like the UK it long ago failed to deliver higher life satisfaction.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Occupy the SEC Urges SEC: Investigate JP Morgan re Sarbanes Oxley Violations JULY
Demeter
Nov 2012
#2
Marshall Auerback: Top 5 Reasons Why Raising the Minimum Wage Is Good for You and Me
Demeter
Nov 2012
#12
All those people who think big gov't is the problem are yet to wake up to the fact that it's always
mother earth
Nov 2012
#34
FROM JULY Another New York Times Columnist Attack on Social Security And Medicare
Demeter
Nov 2012
#16
Oil is off a bit today...it ramped up over 2% yesterday along with everything else.
Roland99
Nov 2012
#36
Interview with Economist Hans-Werner Sinn 'Temporary Euro-Zone Exit Would Stabilize Greece'
xchrom
Nov 2012
#21
HP Alleges Fraud In Autonomy Deal; Takes $8.8B Charge; Shrs At 10-Year Low (Updated)
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2012
#26