Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SeattleVet

(5,485 posts)
3. Missed the first part of that section...
Wed Feb 19, 2014, 11:33 PM
Feb 2014

It's section 13.004(a) that contains the prohibition on transcription, copying, or otherwise recording a telephone number:

http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/EL/htm/EL.13.htm

Sec. 13.004. RECORDING AND DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REGISTRAR. (a) The registrar may not transcribe, copy, or otherwise record a telephone number furnished on a registration application.
(b) The registrar may transcribe, copy, or otherwise record a social security number furnished on a registration application only in maintaining the accuracy of the registration records.
(c) The following information furnished on a registration application is confidential and does not constitute public information for purposes of Chapter 552, Government Code:
...

That comes before the other items that are considered confidential. While not under the 'confidential' label, there appears to be an outright bar on copying the numbers. Unfortunately, O'Keefe got this one right, and Battleground Texas may have violated the statute.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Latest O'Keefe attack on ...»Reply #3