Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pitohui

(20,564 posts)
53. NO author had control of cover illo in the 1960s
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 10:46 PM
Feb 2012

yr claim that "second rate authors" did that on the cover for any reason is completely untrue

authors had no control over the cover illustration and this would include isaac asimov

contracts would say specifically that jacket copy (and even the choice of title) was owned by the publisher not the author

do you really think asimov was a better writer (as opposed to a better selling writer) than heinlein? so asimov gets robots and heinlein gets scantily clad twins? (actually i personally prefer asimov myself but the reality is that both writers were probably about equal as far as literary gift, i just don't like heinlein's fatuous political beliefs)

Because the publishers thought most of the people buying them were teenage boys? csziggy Feb 2012 #1
That's as good an explaination as any. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #6
Creepy? Those covers were awesome. FSogol Feb 2012 #2
Very cool! I really like that bottom one on the scifi list, petronius Feb 2012 #22
Most of the ones I read didn't. Curmudgeoness Feb 2012 #3
It's mostly the pulpy stuff. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #7
Any Ace doubles in the batch? csziggy Feb 2012 #8
We have several dozen of them! Odin2005 Feb 2012 #9
Well, darn. csziggy Feb 2012 #14
Time Enough for Love pokerfan Feb 2012 #10
I stand corrected. Curmudgeoness Feb 2012 #11
Here's one where the woman is wearing more than the dude pokerfan Feb 2012 #12
Heinlein was my favorite growing up. MiddleFingerMom Feb 2012 #16
One of my favorites as well pokerfan Feb 2012 #17
He was always trying to go back in time and nail his mother. PassingFair Feb 2012 #26
My copy of To Sail Beyond the Sunset LeftyMom Feb 2012 #36
Because the male age group that mostly read them dixiegrrrrl Feb 2012 #4
Why do shitty romance novels *still* feature scantily clad characters on their covers? Orrex Feb 2012 #5
It's hard to believe, but back in the 20th Century, humans used "sex" to sell "products" bluedigger Feb 2012 #13
LOL nt cyberswede Feb 2012 #19
Tee hee hee libodem Feb 2012 #20
Targeted Marketing. Chan790 Feb 2012 #15
Space Sex. Show us your Outer Space O-Face!!! MiddleFingerMom Feb 2012 #18
space sex pokerfan Feb 2012 #25
sexay! Bruce Wayne Feb 2012 #30
BECAUSE THERE'S TOO MUCH BOOB FOR THE BOOK TO HOLD! XemaSab Feb 2012 #21
This thread has too much boob for the internet to hold. Bruce Wayne Feb 2012 #29
You mean sci-fi books since the 50s, right? laconicsax Feb 2012 #23
As happens so often in this forum, this can be solved with three little words: Margaret Brundage. dimbear Feb 2012 #24
or Hugo Gernsback baldguy Feb 2012 #27
Brundage was, inspirational, to say the least. pulpcovers Feb 2012 #28
It's a refreshing break from the puritanical world of automobile ads Bruce Wayne Feb 2012 #31
Sharyn McCrumb parodied this brilliantly in "Bimbos of the Death Sun" KamaAina Feb 2012 #32
"Why do sci-fi books from the 60s and 70's have so many scatily-clad women..." greiner3 Feb 2012 #33
How about the 1920's? Edgar Rice Burroughs Baclava Feb 2012 #34
That's one evil looking Gandhi Bucky Feb 2012 #41
it gets better - alien porn! Baclava Feb 2012 #44
Here's the dust jacket from Burrough's "Thuvia, Maid of Mars" Capn Sunshine Feb 2012 #43
If you meant scatologically clad, see the santorum thread! RedCloud Feb 2012 #35
Why was Kilgore Trout my first thought JitterbugPerfume Feb 2012 #37
i owned "that" cover too pitohui Feb 2012 #40
2 reasons pitohui Feb 2012 #38
a humor cover from a local new orleans writer pitohui Feb 2012 #39
There once was a publisher of paperback Gothic novels Aristus Feb 2012 #42
Harlequin Romances? JitterbugPerfume Feb 2012 #45
No, this set of novels went back further than Harlequin. Aristus Feb 2012 #46
I've seen one of those at the thriftstore. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #50
not all were like that Motown_Johnny Feb 2012 #47
NO author had control of cover illo in the 1960s pitohui Feb 2012 #53
You may as well ask why The Avengers' ratings went way down Art_from_Ark Feb 2012 #48
scatily clad? Matariki Feb 2012 #49
maybe because it sold books Old Troop Feb 2012 #51
Because the covers often had little to do with the stories inside ? eppur_se_muova Feb 2012 #52
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Why do sci-fi books from ...»Reply #53