Video & Multimedia

portlander23

(2,078 posts) Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:39 AM Jun 2016

Carl Bernstein: Clinton Used Private Server to Avoid FOIA, Congressional Oversight [View all]

Yep.

84 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Carl Bernstein: Clinton Used Private Server to Avoid FOIA, Congressional Oversight [View all] portlander23 Jun 2016 OP

What did she think she needed to hide? HUBRIS Dustlawyer Jun 2016 #1

And shady deals Carolina Jun 2016 #9

Obama forbade? Just curious nt ALBliberal Jun 2016 #35

WSJ: Who Is Sidney Blumenthal? JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #76

Thank you for providing that Carolina Jun 2016 #81

yep +10 840high Jun 2016 #77

I think that was a good idea to avoid Congressional and FOIA. I worked inFOI:A and Jitter65 Jun 2016 #53

Not mixing personal and business accounts together would be a start zalinda Jun 2016 #69

So because it's too hard we should let her skirt the law, Dustlawyer Jun 2016 #71

excellent EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #2

That really is hilarious so secretive then uses insecure servers. gordianot Jun 2016 #3

Can we put this in the "obviously" category. MisterFred Jun 2016 #4

Hillary Clinton will still win the Democratic nomination and be elected President. George II Jun 2016 #5

Probably true and also sulphurdunn Jun 2016 #8

Maybe but SusanLarson Jun 2016 #11

And take the Democratic Party nyabingi Jun 2016 #13

she doesn't deserve it, imho secondwind Jun 2016 #29

She does imho, and itho of millions of other Americans. George II Jun 2016 #30

They and you are all wrong. That's all. KPN Jun 2016 #51

"Wrong", or of a different opinion? Big difference. George II Jun 2016 #57

Wrong. KPN Jun 2016 #62

^This^ GoneOffShore Jun 2016 #74

.+1 840high Jun 2016 #78

You should at least qualify that with 'I hope.' TransitJohn Jun 2016 #33

Considering she already has a very low trust factor and those numbers continue to slide raindaddy Jun 2016 #34

And the relevance to the OP is....? RiverNoord Jun 2016 #56

The relevance is that these continued attacks on Clinton will not change the nomination or... George II Jun 2016 #59

OK... But that's just a boilerplate, broad statement you could RiverNoord Jun 2016 #83

But we all know the not-so-subtle underlying objective of the OP. George II Jun 2016 #84

And does that not say so much for this country. eom Scalded Nun Jun 2016 #63

But it ..... zentrum Jun 2016 #6

finally ssomeone on the teevee says what we all know tk2kewl Jun 2016 #7

Isn't that special! dchill Jun 2016 #23

He is 100% right, here is her opinon on email before the server in her own words SusanLarson Jun 2016 #10

While I still can: But she has three million more votes. gordianot Jun 2016 #14

Are you still trying to push that b.s.? hellraiser69 Jun 2016 #50

Sorry did not include sarcasm notice. gordianot Jun 2016 #61

And yet she was one of 90 people in State who were using personal emails pnwmom Jun 2016 #21

I think though that she is the first one to have a 'server' Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #37

Legally there is no difference. The Federal records act would distinguish pnwmom Jun 2016 #41

Okay, good to know. Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #75

Unfortunately, there will never be an end to this -- and not because of Hillary's fault. pnwmom Jun 2016 #80

I don't think Obama nyabingi Jun 2016 #12

What you said! ^^^^^^^^^^ Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #16

+10,000 nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #19

Great post! dchill Jun 2016 #25

Excellent post MissDeeds Jun 2016 #47

.that^ 840high Jun 2016 #79

Except there's no evidence. He's just making it up as he goes. For example, pnwmom Jun 2016 #15

Ethical standards SusanLarson Jun 2016 #17

????? OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #20

No. Read Cheryl Mills testimony in the Judicial Watch deposition. pnwmom Jun 2016 #22

That is COMPLETELY beside the point. dchill Jun 2016 #26

No, it contradicts Carl Bernsteins claim that they set up the server to avoid pnwmom Jun 2016 #42

That makes zero sense. They hooked it up to DOS when she was AntiBank Jun 2016 #49

It does not contradict anything. dchill Jun 2016 #52

Still trying and failing to be relevant after all these years. Bernstein and Woodward. Losers. Laser102 Jun 2016 #18

sorry, but shooting any and all messengers via ad hominen attacks AntiBank Jun 2016 #45

yup they sure railroaded nixon... Javaman Jun 2016 #70

BFD Gman Jun 2016 #24

I always wondered why... Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #27

Why is this right wing conspiracy shit posted Gman Jun 2016 #28

The FBI and the State IG are part of a RW conspiracy? Matt_in_STL Jun 2016 #31

YES: CARL BERNSTEIN IS A MISOGYNIST REPUBLICAN BERNIE BRO CONSPIRACY THEORIST TheSarcastinator Jun 2016 #39

Whatever. It's through right-wing horse shit Gman Jun 2016 #46

you and others have labled anything that doesn't suit AntiBank Jun 2016 #44

This is just more crap aiding fascism in America Gman Jun 2016 #48

no, it's about the long process of exposing truth, regardless AntiBank Jun 2016 #54

Truth??? HA!!! Gman Jun 2016 #67

Yes, I know it is perhaps an alien concept, but when it comes to criminal investigations, an AntiBank Jun 2016 #68

Thank goodness we only have less than a week left of this crap Gman Jun 2016 #72

do you really think this is going to go away on the 16th? AntiBank Jun 2016 #73

Is it the 16th yet? Orrex Jun 2016 #32

I know, right? TheSarcastinator Jun 2016 #40

If tRump wins those "Grey skies" are gonna be radioactive wolfie001 Jun 2016 #58

Or, less melodramatically... Orrex Jun 2016 #65

the FBI and the DOJ don't give a rat's arse about June 16th AntiBank Jun 2016 #55

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #36

Carl Bernstein is a MISOGYNIST REPUBLICAN BERNIE BRO COMMIE TheSarcastinator Jun 2016 #38

So the Dems want to nominate someone in Effing FREEFALL that they are scared of losing????? zebonaut Jun 2016 #43

... Mira Jun 2016 #64

Top Democrats should be terrified! KPN Jun 2016 #60

She did the same as previous Secretaries of State liberal N proud Jun 2016 #66

She is the only SOS that had their own unsecured server in their home. AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #82