Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)"Foxy Ladies: Why one network applies so much makeup" By Liza Mundy at the Atlantic [View all]
Foxy Ladies: Why one network applies so much makeupBy Liza Mundy at the Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/09/foxy-ladies/309054/?en=1
"SNIP...................................
But heres the newer development: Its not just anchors who are pressured to look good while talking, its relatively ordinary women, too. For a contingent of female bloggers, ideologues, advocates, pundits, and writers, a Fox gig brings with it an unexpected dilemma. There you are, a renowned expert on nuclear proliferation/immigration policy/the Middle East, obliged to regard yourself in the mirror and ask: Will I really go on national television looking like a cross between Captain Jack Sparrow and a waitress from Hooters?
Not that you have much of a choice. I see that you like a natural look, a Fox makeup artist said to me, then proceeded to paint a red line slightly outside the edge of my lips, and fill it in with ample gloss. A stylist curled my hair and teased it; when she asked if I wore it flipped up or under, I said under. She flipped it up, venturing that up is cuter. Other artists told me that if network executives dont like what they see on a guest, the phone rings promptly. (Fox did not respond to requests for comment.)
Fox no doubt has several reasons for pursuing the look one guest described as Fox glam. The advent of high-definition TV screens is probably one of them: saturated colors (including, conveniently, red) work well in HD. And then theres the management. Gabriel Sherman, a journalist working on a book about Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes, notes makeups unique role in Ailess creation myth, which dates to a fateful encounter with Richard Nixon. When Nixon lost to John F. Kennedy, in 1960, many said that his fate had been sealed by bad makeup during a televised debate. Before an appearance on The Mike Douglas Show seven years later, Nixon groused about having to stoop so low as to go on television; Ailes, the executive producer for the show, persuaded him to embrace the medium, and the makeup. Nixon hired him to work on his next presidential campaign, and won.
Ailes, Sherman points out, under-stands that while TV news may be journalism, it is also entertainment. He works like a Broadway producer, says Sherman (indeed, at one point Ailes was a Broadway producer). That, Sherman says, is why Fox sets look like stage sets: The colors are brighter, the camera angles faster. Everything pops on the screen more, everything is eye candy.
.....................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 3290 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Foxy Ladies: Why one network applies so much makeup" By Liza Mundy at the Atlantic [View all]
applegrove
Aug 2012
OP
"everything is eye candy." wrong. the men are all dogs. the women are eye candy. nt
seabeyond
Aug 2012
#2
They are trying to attract "older men" with all those brightly coloured women. So where are the GOP
applegrove
Aug 2012
#3