Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Escurumbele

(3,389 posts)

6. The one thing I still cannot get my head to comprehend is why is the DOJ defending the asshole?

Reply to douglas9 (Original post)

Wed Dec 1, 2021, 09:38 AM

Dec 2021

Why are we, the tax payers, paying for his defense. What is wrong with Garland? The DOJ should be out of it, let the buffoon, who claims to be a billionaire, pay for his own defense.

This is so screwed up, from the DOJ side. What can we, the tax payers, say or do to stop the DOJ from defending the buffoon?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump v. Me [View all] douglas9 Dec 2021 OP

Please don't settle Sucha NastyWoman Dec 2021 #1

Merrick Garland could do something about this. Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #2

And a lot of other things as well. Ligyron Dec 2021 #3

Yup. Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #4

Apparently, he's busy! dchill Dec 2021 #5

You do not know. Three month long grand jury investigation you only found out yesterday Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #12

Except the Sidney Powell case gab13by13 Dec 2021 #13

Lots to do w Jan 6. Her activities & actions started BEFORE Jan 6. She was key part of pushing lie Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #14

This case is about rich GQP donors getting scammed by Sidney Powell, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #15

And that to you is proof Garland is doing nothing? Does not take 3 months of grand jury time Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #16

No, the fact that Garland took the E. Jeanne Carroll case scares me, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #17

He didn't take the case. You previously posted in THIS thread that you were wrong on that point.. nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #18

He didn't take the case gab13by13 Dec 2021 #20

First word of your quote: "IF". Appears twice. You don't know, Tribe doesn't know, I don't know. Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #19

Wasn't it Garland who took the case? gab13by13 Dec 2021 #9

I was wrong, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #11

The one thing I still cannot get my head to comprehend is why is the DOJ defending the asshole? Escurumbele Dec 2021 #6

I think it's the office of the presidency. Joinfortmill Dec 2021 #8

That's the reason many gave here, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #10

Wow, just wow. TFG is gonna be toast. Joinfortmill Dec 2021 #7