Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
16. Hmm. Agree and disagree.
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 11:37 AM
Mar 2012

"It is not to be thought of in a civilized community for a moment that any citizen put in jeopardy of life or liberty should be debarred of counsel because he is too poor to employ such aid," the Indiana court wrote. "No court could be expected to respect itself to sit and hear such a trial. The defense of the poor in such cases is a duty which will at once be conceded as essential to the accused, to the court and to the public."

Sounds like Zimmerman was between jobs, so on the one hand, I support his access to legal defense, just as ANY citizen, no matter how apparently innocent or heinous. If some people want to raise some money for that, fine. On the other hand, I don't think 'gun owners' have any particular dog in this fight, as the law didn't protect what he did at all. As a gun owner, I don't particularly want to be associated with this effort.

And of course, this will be used by some as an excuse to treat everyone with a gun as a maniac. TheWraith Mar 2012 #1
It is pretty damned contemptible, I hope you agree. hlthe2b Mar 2012 #4
I think you are wrong this time. Even Joe s & Mica came out against Z. I think this is a time peacebird Mar 2012 #7
I do hope you are correct. nt nanabugg Apr 2012 #35
Is the NRA blameless too? lunatica Mar 2012 #21
Can we treat THOSE guys with guns who are doing the collection as the maniacs they are? 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #32
Uggh... it is this extremist attitude and the unquestioning defense of NRA and its policies... hlthe2b Mar 2012 #2
Hmm. Agree and disagree. AtheistCrusader Mar 2012 #16
Fucking figures! Ecumenist Mar 2012 #3
By funding a "defense," they acknowledge that Zimmerman commited a crime, chollybocker Mar 2012 #5
No, they are acknowledging they feel Zimmerman will charged with a crime. nt ZombieHorde Mar 2012 #11
Gun enthusiasts should sit this one out. Devil_Fish Mar 2012 #6
The smart ones will Major Nikon Mar 2012 #8
Not me guitar man Mar 2012 #9
+1 denem Mar 2012 #14
Bingo Speaker Apr 2012 #34
i doubt they`ll get enough money for any lawyer who would take this case madrchsod Mar 2012 #10
Think again. A high profile case like this will attract a lot of potential lawyers wanting to make a totodeinhere Mar 2012 #12
I still believe it is all about the race. shimonitanegi Mar 2012 #13
Wuz a time durin the pistol packin west when if'n a man shot an unarmed man he wuz hung Monk06 Mar 2012 #15
'Lest'n he was stealing a horse JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2012 #19
Or russlin cattle lunatica Mar 2012 #22
if they want to set fire to their money, let them... Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #17
Murder enthusiasts Hawkowl Mar 2012 #18
Yet yesterday... primavera Apr 2012 #28
That's the way it works Hawkowl Apr 2012 #31
Morons! kenfrequed Mar 2012 #20
Won't matter... ellisonz Mar 2012 #23
Right wing douchebag vigilante gun nuts defending the indefensible jpak Mar 2012 #24
And the "enthusiasts" wonder why people like me crim son Mar 2012 #25
"The Gunshine State" ! MrMickeysMom Mar 2012 #26
The cowboys live...he was not the Lone Ranger, but NRA would have you believe he was. nt mother earth Mar 2012 #27
I noticed a couple teaching freepers lately Kingofalldems Apr 2012 #29
they should give money to other murderers lovemydog Apr 2012 #30
THESE are gun nuts. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gun enthusiasts start def...»Reply #16