Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»PG&E: Pipeline upgrad...»Reply #8
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

In reply to the discussion: PG&E: Pipeline upgrade could top $11 billion [View all]

cstanleytech

(26,337 posts)
8. Because this way they can get the public to pay for stuff and they (executive level people)
Reply to Pachamama (Reply #7)
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 01:06 AM
Mar 2012

dont have to do something like take a pay cut themselves to pay for things like pipeline upgrades or nuclear reactors.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
PG&E: Pipeline upgrade could top $11 billion [View all] alp227 Mar 2012 OP
Wasn't PG&E already paid for this upgrade? w4rma Mar 2012 #1
OT but I think I have read that a certain major telecom (I wont sAy The name of The telecom) cstanleytech Mar 2012 #5
I propose you all nationalize PG&E OffWithTheirHeads Mar 2012 #2
Screw that. If they were paid to do the work make them do the work and if they have a cstanleytech Mar 2012 #6
FUCK THIS! Firebrand Gary Mar 2012 #3
+1! Fearless Mar 2012 #4
I agree - if the public has to fork out 84%, then the public should then own 84% of the revenues. IndyJones Mar 2012 #9
Why are "Public Utilities" not Public? Why is this run privately? Pachamama Mar 2012 #7
Because this way they can get the public to pay for stuff and they (executive level people) cstanleytech Mar 2012 #8
If they can't pay for it, then I guess they need to get someone else in who can. Has there IndyJones Mar 2012 #10
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»PG&E: Pipeline upgrad...»Reply #8
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.