Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. war crimes ambassador: Assad ‘absolutely’ should be tried for war crimes [View all]Nihil
(13,508 posts)... this will probably be my only reply as I honestly do not believe you want any answers.
Point 1: My post was answering someone who didn't like the thought of the US "War Crimes Ambassador"
being described as "not having clean enough hands". It was not saying a thing about the location or
makeup of any trial so, yet again, you have posted a non-sequitur to divert the actual conversation.
Point 2: The OP article states that they are training Syrians to "collect evidence", not to hold
a trial themselves. Every reference includes an "international" qualifier, not a "Syrian" one.
e.g.,
> but the quantity and quality of the evidence against him means his prosecutor
> would have one of the better cases that weve seen at the international level against a chief of state.
> a blend of national and international staff with the support of regional powers.
> Our preference is to work with Syrians, with people in the region, with international players
> the type of accountability that they will face in the long run from the international community
So, for the second time, your posts are transparent disruption & attempted diversion.
Hope you are having a nice day on your planet.