Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Justice Department to appeal judge's Plan B order [View all]blackspade
(10,056 posts)43. That happens all the time.
So we should shaft progressive judicial results one of the few times this kind of shit goes our way?
My point is that it is harder to unmake a judicial decision like this that an administrative one.
And I am perfectly aware that it cuts both ways. It's been cutting the conservative way for decades.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is so frustrating that this administration, when it can act without obstruction
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#1
2/3 of the states have republican governors. 80% of the people don't want it, but govs do.
graham4anything
May 2013
#11
No. But it has to be done correctly. Blame the judge that ruled the other day for the timing.
graham4anything
May 2013
#12
So you ask why wouldn't anyone want the President to have as much power as possible? First, because
24601
May 2013
#23
breaking news- Jefferson lied. Forget the BOR as they are preditated on a lie
graham4anything
May 2013
#24
You can rely on the original constitution if you want - I'll instead consider the amendments to be
24601
May 2013
#25
Then reinterpreting the 2nd should be right up your alley, I know it's up mine.
graham4anything
May 2013
#26
You need to re-read what I said. I offered nothing about Jefferson. But the post-civil war
24601
May 2013
#31
Nader had everything to do with Bush being seated in 2000. November came before December.
graham4anything
May 2013
#47
Nader got people NOT to vote. He told them why bother, both parties the same.
graham4anything
May 2013
#50
Yes, it is. And the other side effects include nausea, stomach pain, dizziness,...
Pterodactyl
May 2013
#16
people do need to realise this med is just a higher dose of some regular type birth control pills.
Sunlei
May 2013
#30
You people flipping out over the headline, this doesn't affect yesterdays age change
SpartanDem
May 2013
#14
Are you saying they agree with the decision, they just wanted to say it themselves?
muriel_volestrangler
May 2013
#22
If the DOJ wins, then couldn't the next administration just change the regulation?
byeya
May 2013
#33
Yes, but if they lose. You could be potentially be setting a precedent for a conservative judge
SpartanDem
May 2013
#34
Ordinarily I would prefer the FDA to rule on drugs and their availability and usage. Maybe that was
byeya
May 2013
#66
If you don't want abortions & you don't want unwanted pregnancies, this pill is the best thing going
judesedit
May 2013
#28
Supposed you are the Pharmacist with a 15 year old female comes in accompanied by a
24601
May 2013
#63
LBJ was more liberal than Bernie Sanders and the protesters took LBJ down
graham4anything
May 2013
#48
LBJ had 1000s of achievements. While others dreamed, LBJ did. I love LBJ!
graham4anything
May 2013
#57
you just agreed with me. Looking back, tis easy to see and make sure NEVER AGAIN
graham4anything
May 2013
#59
My understanding is that men can buy it, although some pharmacists have refused to sell it. n/t
winter is coming
May 2013
#65
Some pharmacists have claimed they are concerned men who buy it may be a pimp or rapist
davidn3600
May 2013
#70
I've never seen or heard any indication that there's an age restriction for Tylenol.
winter is coming
May 2013
#64