Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Prop. 8: Gay-marriage ban unconstitutional, court rules [View all]truebrit71
(20,805 posts)46. That is AWESOME!!!!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My first post when this all began was that it would be called unconstitutional.
Gregorian
Feb 2012
#13
Here's hoping the opponents spend hundreds of millions more in a losing SC appeal.
Ikonoklast
Feb 2012
#32
Well there goes the neighborhood. So much for that much desired monoculture of uptight ethics.
Gregorian
Feb 2012
#37
Great point. And we dont want it to go higher with this SCOTUS. Once they rule it is very hard to
rhett o rick
Feb 2012
#75
The consequences of losing is too great for the risk in my opinion when the possibility
rhett o rick
Feb 2012
#100
I understand completely. I meant that with the risk, I hope it doesnt go at this time. nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2012
#105
Kennedy was the deciding vote in Romer v. Evans, and wrote the opinion, I believe.
morningfog
Feb 2012
#110