Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
20. Much of the article is about Brennan's objections to torture,
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jan 2013

public and private. From the Reuters link:

After Brennan temporarily left government service in 2005, he publicly disavowed waterboarding, a form of simulated drowning, and other physically painful techniques that are often described as torture.

.....

Brennan was among agency officials who were uncomfortable with the use of physically coercive tactics, despite the legal opinions that supported their use. He expressed concern, according to these officials, that if details of the program became public, it would be CIA officers who would face criticism, rather than the politicians and lawyers who approved them.

"If John says he expressed reservations about some techniques, I believe him because he's an honest guy," said John McLaughlin, who was deputy CIA director at the time.

"Mr. Brennan had significant concerns and personal objections to many elements of the EIT (enhanced interrogation techniques) program while it was under way," a senior administration official said in response to Reuters' inquiries. "He voiced those objections privately with colleagues at the agency."



I am offended that Obama wants to appoint a man to the CIA who was associated with torture. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #1
blame good ol' W? if Brennan really had no idea, he's not to blame farminator3000 Jan 2013 #2
Let's hope that he explains his relationship with those who tortured when he goes through his JDPriestly Jan 2013 #24
For probably the first time in my life, I agree with kas125 Jan 2013 #3
don't go there! farminator3000 Jan 2013 #5
are you serious with blame W? yurbud Jan 2013 #13
Much of the article is about Brennan's objections to torture, ucrdem Jan 2013 #20
i missploke. for torture, blame dickbag cheney. farminator3000 Jan 2013 #21
Me too newfie11 Jan 2013 #11
If 'enhanced interrogation' is so bad then why Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #4
we can still BLAME W! farminator3000 Jan 2013 #6
We ALL know that dotymed Jan 2013 #22
I don't think McCain is the only one upset about Obama joelz Jan 2013 #7
no, don't blame W. this might get ugly! not about torture at all anymore... farminator3000 Jan 2013 #8
It seems no matter who sits in the White House, the military-industrial complex still holds power nt Selatius Jan 2013 #9
Just as Eisenhower warned the nation over 50 years ago. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2013 #19
If John McCain doesn't like him, then I know he's swell. nt EastKYLiberal Jan 2013 #10
John McCain is no one to talk. another_liberal Jan 2013 #12
Thank you... rosesaylavee Jan 2013 #14
and thank you. appacom Jan 2013 #15
Torture is as American as cherry pie (with apologies coalition_unwilling Jan 2013 #16
Can we stop with the Doublespeak Kelvin Mace Jan 2013 #17
McCain can complain, but it won't matter. OnyxCollie Jan 2013 #18
kind of like rush limberger interviewing a new-age ollie north. hoooo boy getting ripe in there farminator3000 Jan 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Exclusive: CIA nominee ha...»Reply #20