Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell Reach Filibuster Reform Deal [View all]Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)38. It's the only way Democrats can make "lists of accomplishments" HATER!!
They can't be said to have done anything if they don't partner with Republicans to enact what is favorable to Republicans, that being the case, the only way to make the lists is to put the D signature on GOP accomplishments, it is the pragmatic way to serve Corporations while misleading the voters into thinking they mean that silly progressive nonsense they spout during campaigns.
If you don't support the efforts to cave in a way that makes a list you are a firebagin' "retard" as Rahm might say.
We need fresh Thinking! Third Way lists and goals are the grown up thing to do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I said that right after the election to anyone that would listen. Damn few would. Pelosi isn't
Purveyor
Jan 2013
#10
I disagree. Nancy presided over the most productive House in U.S. history. What she got passed was
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2013
#65
And Feinstein was listed as one of the seven not on board with talking fillibuster...
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#22
Feinstein is notorious for proposing bills that sound Liberal...but, then go down.
KoKo
Jan 2013
#54
I'm shocked...shocked I tell you that Harry folded like a Dollar General lawnchair. Suckers!!! eom
Purveyor
Jan 2013
#3
"Progressive senators working to dramatically alter Senate rules were defeated on Thursday"
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#4
Yep, Reid just wants the ILLUSION that he wants real reform to have the Senate WORK again!
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#28
What do you base that on? They didn't change the rules when they had the majority.
24601
Jan 2013
#74
They threatened to get rid of it completely until we folded like a lawn chair.
Dragonfli
Jan 2013
#80
Reid made the same threat - just words. It's unlikely that a majority of the Senators would give
24601
Jan 2013
#87
Note that the article indicates that Reid was apparently upset the names of the 6 were released.
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#17
Huffington Post article had already "leaked" these names, though some of them don't match up...
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#29
Isn't our party's acting spectacular? I wonder what progressive measures
woo me with science
Jan 2013
#25
I understand your frustration and I share it. But the part of your comment that I take exception
totodeinhere
Jan 2013
#39
Wow, you type faster and far more succinctly than I, but I tried to say much the same!
Dragonfli
Jan 2013
#49
I have enough knowledge of party history to know that while there were strong progressive elements
totodeinhere
Jan 2013
#69
AFAICT, they're operating under the belief that Republicans won't take away the filibuster
jeff47
Jan 2013
#85
I could just easily scream BOOOOOOOO!!!! but would rather recommend taking action
alp227
Jan 2013
#43
One opportunity, have you been in a cave the last 4 years? they did it nearly EVERY
Dragonfli
Jan 2013
#60
If Dems were a minority, I'd PREFER a talking filibuster, as Bernie Sanders HAS and WOULD!!!
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#63
I wonder what would have happened if Sharon Angle had beaten him earlier...
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#64
After thinking about this more, the Democrats will likely be in the minority in 2014.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2013
#75