Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: (SCOTUS) Justices Look at Legality of Drunken-Driving Test [View all]dballance
(5,756 posts)3. Okay SCOTUS may have made a good decision for a change
Last edited Thu Jan 10, 2013, 04:22 PM - Edit history (1)
I think they were right to question how it might be okay to stick a needle in some one's arm without a warrant. I cannot see how that is NOT a violation of a person's privacy. How prosecutors could possibly think that is okay baffles me. Aren't prosecutors supposed to be fair and ethical? Talk about prosecutorial misconduct. That would seem to be the best example.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I expect that they will rule that warrants must be obtained when they reasonably can be
Orrex
Jan 2013
#22
Well, given the way they ruled on Florence last year, I don't have much hope...
Blue_Tires
Jan 2013
#30
I have a relative who had a pretty bad stroke. He gets around just fine, but he can look a little
MADem
Jan 2013
#27