Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
26. That is the same Judge involved in this case.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:46 PM
Dec 2012

The Senior Judge issued the restriction but as I pointed out above, this case will be heard by an Obama appointee.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_B._Shubb

He was Federal Prosecutor from 1980 to 1981 (i.e. Carter's last year) and, while appointed to the Judgeship by Bush Sr., in 1990. Federal Judges, while technically appointed by the President, are in reality selected by a State's Senators (If the President picks someone else, the nomination never gets to the floor of the Senate by Senate rules). In 1990 that would have been Barbara Boxer AND Republican Pete Wilson.

In this CBS Article another Judge is to hearing the actual legal Arguments, U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57556372/californias-gay-reparative-therapy-ban-faces-legal-test/

U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller is an Obama Appointee:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimberly_J._Mueller

Actual Text of Statute in Question:
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120SB1172

"Please, your honor, DON'T make us stop psychogically torturing gay teenagers... Ken Burch Dec 2012 #1
As a gay DUer, and a law student no less, the Judge made the right call- cecilfirefox Dec 2012 #2
a law student should by now know the difference between affect and effect n/t Occulus Dec 2012 #4
Ahem--laws do 'effect.' You would file a TRO, or similar, as in this case, before the 'effect' or msanthrope Dec 2012 #9
And therefore, we feel no surprise that this one does Yo_Mama Dec 2012 #11
Agreed. Xithras Dec 2012 #6
He found a get out jail card under his overly used robe. nolabels Dec 2012 #8
Actually the issue is the Constitutional Right to raise Children happyslug Dec 2012 #16
How can this be anything but child abuse? We need a new ERA movement that includes Politicub Dec 2012 #21
It is clearly not PHYSICAL Child abuse happyslug Dec 2012 #24
This law isn't "speech." It deals with the practice of psychiatry. Politicub Dec 2012 #20
Actually it is a Fundamental Right to Raise your Child Case happyslug Dec 2012 #25
Sometimes judicial precedent is wrong. Politicub Dec 2012 #29
As a seasoned attorney this is bullcrap...... Swede Atlanta Dec 2012 #28
But isn't that exactly what the judge wants to review? Xithras Dec 2012 #30
The Judge is a gay DUer??? Chef Eric Dec 2012 #10
There's no place in modern psychiatry for torturing lgbt kids. Politicub Dec 2012 #17
I should point out, this seems to be a Fundamental Right to Raise Children Case happyslug Dec 2012 #22
" saying it was based on "questionable and scientifically incomplete studies." azurnoir Dec 2012 #3
No one claim anyone had died under this therapy, but that "abuse" has occurred happyslug Dec 2012 #18
Daddy Bush appointee. Le Taz Hot Dec 2012 #5
In other words, a useless judge that should not have been considered. Panasonic Dec 2012 #12
Seems to be a Democrat, and anyway the case will be heard by another Democrartic Judge happyslug Dec 2012 #19
"Questionable and scientifically incomplete" my ass! NickP Dec 2012 #7
Shrub (GHW Bush), not Dubya. alp227 Dec 2012 #13
To be heard by a Obama appointee: happyslug Dec 2012 #23
Kick (nt) muriel_volestrangler Dec 2012 #14
UPDATE: A second federal judge in a second case on Tuesday issued a contrary ruling FreeState Dec 2012 #15
That is the same Judge involved in this case. happyslug Dec 2012 #26
Its a separate case - not the same judge FreeState Dec 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge temporarily blocks ...»Reply #26