Latest Breaking News

MrModerate

(9,753 posts)

39. You need to chill out and stop projecting . . .

Mon Nov 26, 2012, 12:25 AM

Nov 2012

What I must assume is a horrible personal experience onto other people. Your posts are contrafactual and your zealotry destroys any credibility you might have. And that's unfortunate, because otherwise your story might be genuinely instructive.

However, as the parent of adopted children (AKA "the parent of children&quot , I find your downright nastiness (not to mention self-righteousness) more than a little offensive.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Europe mulls banning 'boxes' for abandoned babies [View all] Omaha Steve Nov 2012 OP

What "pro-lifers" fail to realize lbrtbell Nov 2012 #1

Does this really differ Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #2

They allow for more anonymity without compromising the child's safety. Squinch Nov 2012 #10

The child's safety has been damaged the moment of relinquishment me b zola Nov 2012 #11

My family consists of many adopted, adored, well adjusted people. I completely disagree with you. Squinch Nov 2012 #13

We are able to achieve all kinds of things in spite of having our identities stolen me b zola Nov 2012 #18

Adopting and loving and raising a child is not human trafficking. Squinch Nov 2012 #21

You are not purchasing a puppy from the pound me b zola Nov 2012 #25

Again, you are grossly generalizing, in a way that is offensive to loving families. Squinch Nov 2012 #27

It's glaringly apparent you know zero about the adoption process. nt Javaman Nov 2012 #40

Oh, PUHLEEEEZE! bitchkitty Nov 2012 #14

Exactly Squinch Nov 2012 #17

Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #20

And I guess you need to generalize your experience to places where it doesn't apply in any way. Squinch Nov 2012 #22

You see, that is part of the big lie that feeds the exploitation of women and children me b zola Nov 2012 #24

Except that's not what I said me b zola Nov 2012 #23

Pro-human traffickers? bitchkitty Nov 2012 #37

You need to chill out and stop projecting . . . MrModerate Nov 2012 #39

We have young friends, a happily married couple, who could not JDPriestly Nov 2012 #34

I am sorry I did not see this conversation before yoy had a post hidden. Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #38

The UN is against the baby boxes. ChazII Nov 2012 #3

The UN has been working very hard to protect the rights of children and women me b zola Nov 2012 #12

My niece would have died get the red out Nov 2012 #29

Well said, get the red out. n/t ChazII Nov 2012 #36

The UN should femrap Nov 2012 #31

I am on your side. ChazII Nov 2012 #35

Keep The Baby Boxes! Vogon_Glory Nov 2012 #4

I agree indie_voter Nov 2012 #6

100% agree get the red out Nov 2012 #7

I don't understand the objection to the baby boxes. Like another DU member said above, I see these tropicanarose Nov 2012 #5

No social safety net in the world get the red out Nov 2012 #8

I think it may be similar to objections to food banks daleo Nov 2012 #26

and so much of this can go away once the Catholic church changes NuttyFluffers Nov 2012 #9

Yes, churches have been a large part of the problem me b zola Nov 2012 #16

Nebraska should have never caved to pressure on their abandonment law, which was up to age 19. justice1 Nov 2012 #15

Really? LisaL Nov 2012 #33

I don't understand. elleng Nov 2012 #19

Because an unwanted baby is much better off dying in a dumpster thelordofhell Nov 2012 #28

Again, Lord, we agree completely. Squinch Nov 2012 #30

"European men mull banning 'boxes' for abandoned babies" fixed your headline. nt DRoseDARs Nov 2012 #32