Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftInTX

(25,287 posts)
16. There is alot going on with this case
Thu Aug 11, 2022, 09:29 AM
Aug 2022

Last edited Thu Aug 11, 2022, 10:27 AM - Edit history (2)

If true:
Mother obtained two pills for her daughter who was either 23 weeks and 2 days pregnant or 28 weeks pregnant. ( Miscarriage was April 22..Affidavit says 23 weeks/2 days with a due date of July 3 which would make her about 28 weeks pregnant. The dates are contradictory)

In the US, the pills can only be prescribed during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.
This would then violate laws about taking "medication as prescribed". Plan C is strictly regulated in all 50 states.

Celeste could have sought treatment via telemedicine prior to 12 weeks and obtained the pills legally.

Additionally, her mother could have also purchased the pills underground and gave them to her prior to 12 weeks.
(Although this would not be "legal", it would have been the safer thing to do)
Studies have shown that women further along than 12 weeks need more pills.
Celeste is lucky that she miscarried safely instead of having complications
We don't know why she waited until she was 24 weeks, however 24 weeks is also considered viability
The only state that allows abortion after 24 weeks is New York and these are only for cases of health, life endangerment or lethal fetal anomalies.
It appears that Celeste had prenatal care on March 8th, so did she change her mind about her pregnancy?

A few days after she miscarried, Celeste's "friend" went to the police and said that they buried a fetus/baby
With the assistance of Celeste and her mother, police exhumed the fetus
Autopsy shows the birth was stillborn
Celeste, her mom and a young man were charged with an illegal burying law.

Celeste was then questioned by a cop about the illegal burying.
She did not have an attorney or parent with her while being questioned.
The cop asked her what date she miscarried and Celeste opened up her phone and went through her messenger app in front of the cop.
Police then obtained a warrant for her fb messenger

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/22129444/view-img-17.pdf
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/22129445/view-img-19.pdf

Is there over reach in this prosecution here? You bet!!!
Why is the affidavit contradictory with regards to her pregnancy due date and number of weeks pregnant? Is she 5 months or is she 7 month pregnant?
Can they prove alot of this? I'm not sure.
If Celeste had obtained an abortion by a provider at 24 weeks, the provider would have committed a crime.
However, we don't know if there is actually a record of pills being purchased
Did Celeste confess to taking the pills or is this what the friend is saying?
Did the pills cause Celeste to miscarry?

The only hard evidence they have is that Celeste, her mom and a young man buried a fetus.
We don't know if the fetus was 23 weeks/2 days or 28 weeks?

If 28 weeks, I'm pretty sure this was a total stillbirth. The pills could have caused premature labor, but baby would have breathed on it's own. Autopsy shows that no air was in the lungs. The pills would not cause this.

Is this FB fault? No, Celeste showed them the messages and the police obtained a warrant. They could have obtained a warrant for SMS texts if Celeste and her mom had been texting SMS

Not much of a "friend". tonekat Aug 2022 #1
Does Nebraska have a bounty hunter law like Texas? catrose Aug 2022 #4
Families have to use encrypted texts? RussBLib Aug 2022 #2
The girl showed the cops her messenger app and then they got a warrant LeftInTX Aug 2022 #5
A lot of folks are not taking your above note with full attention. Layzeebeaver Aug 2022 #15
Yeah, but sadly she was 17 and was questioned without an attorney or parent present LeftInTX Aug 2022 #17
Don't use traitorbook rockfordfile Aug 2022 #3
Apparently, I've been banned from fb not fooled Aug 2022 #6
Facebook wanted to label me a political activist Heather MC Aug 2022 #23
Unsurprising not fooled Aug 2022 #25
Oh well I somehow managed without their existence before 2009 Heather MC Aug 2022 #26
there is a bit of self-incriminating strangeness about this case Layzeebeaver Aug 2022 #7
Outlawing people just talking about something seems to violate the 1st amendment no matter where AZLD4Candidate Aug 2022 #9
perhaps Layzeebeaver Aug 2022 #11
So, are you saying you think this type of law and prosecution is acceptable? AZLD4Candidate Aug 2022 #12
NO I did not say that. Layzeebeaver Aug 2022 #14
There is alot going on with this case LeftInTX Aug 2022 #16
Their conversation about it was just gathered as evidence, it isn't, itself, the crime. JudyM Aug 2022 #20
"Your phone is a cop" ... reACTIONary Aug 2022 #8
The law is unconstitutional to start with. AZLD4Candidate Aug 2022 #10
What law? The fourth amendment to the constitution clearly... reACTIONary Aug 2022 #19
I just have to ask....did "Meta" (Facebook) now in a lawsuit for copyright name and laws turbinetree Aug 2022 #13
I'm getting confused over which warrants are proper and to be complied with. bluedigger Aug 2022 #18
If these horrible laws weren't in place purr-rat beauty Aug 2022 #21
As much as I hate Facebook and Zuck, they had no choice but to obey the warrant. The real Vinca Aug 2022 #22
"Charged Over Abortion" 867-5309. Aug 2022 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Facebook Turned Over Chat...»Reply #16