Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,464 posts)
Thu Jun 23, 2022, 10:33 AM Jun 2022

Supreme Court says N.Y. gun law is too restrictive, violates right to carry guns outside home [View all]

Source: Washington Post

COURTS & LAW

Supreme Court says N.Y. gun law is too restrictive, violates right to carry guns outside home for self-defense

By Robert Barnes
Updated June 23, 2022 at 10:53 a.m. EDT Published June 23, 2022 at 10:48 a.m. EDT

The Supreme Court on Thursday said Americans generally have a right to carry a handgun outside the home for self-defense and that a New York law requiring special need for such a permit is too restrictive.

The vote was 6 to 3, with Justice Clarence Thomas writing for the majority and the court's three liberals in dissent. (1)

"The Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual's right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home," Thomas wrote, saying New York's requirement of a specific need to carry a weapon violates that right.

In dissent, Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote: "Many States have tried to address some of the dangers of gun violence ... by passing laws that limit, in various ways, who may purchase, carry, or use firearms of different kinds. The Court today severely burdens States' efforts to do so."

{snip}

The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. Bruen.

By Robert Barnes
Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He joined The Post to cover Maryland politics, and he has served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor and national political editor. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006. Twitter https://twitter.com/scotusreporter

(1) https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/23/supreme-court-gun-control/



Edited to add the link, which I can't believe I forgot to include.

-- -- -- -- -- --

BREAKING: #scotus strikes NY firearm restrictions on 6-3 vote, with Thomas writing for majority (on his birthday) https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf




-- -- -- -- -- --

Supreme Court says Second Amendment guarantees right to carry guns in public

The ruling expands upon a 2008 decision that said the Second Amendment safeguards a person's right to possess firearms at home for self-protection.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-says-second-amendment-guarantees-right-carry-guns-public-rcna17721

June 23, 2022, 10:34 AM EDT
By Pete Williams

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Constitution provides a right to carry a gun outside the home, issuing a major decision on the meaning of the Second Amendment.

The 6-3 ruling was the court's second important decision on the right to "keep and bear arms." In a landmark 2008 decision, the court said for the first time that the amendment safeguards a person's right to possess firearms, although the decision was limited to keeping guns at home for self-defense.

The court has now taken that ruling to the next step after years of ducking the issue and applied the Second Amendment beyond the limits of homeowners' property.
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's Faux pas Jun 2022 #1
Yes. And at full throttle. n/to Harker Jun 2022 #3
Sadly Faux pas Jun 2022 #30
What are they worried about? They have special protection for them and Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #5
The Faux pas Jun 2022 #28
Six months later... jmowreader Jun 2022 #2
THIS CaptainTruth Jun 2022 #54
Yep. LoisB Jun 2022 #55
Oh my god............. secondwind Jun 2022 #4
I said three words out loud. underpants Jun 2022 #15
somehow llashram Jun 2022 #6
Their Roe v Wade decision will result in many unwanted children. MarcA Jun 2022 #45
one is waiting llashram Jun 2022 #71
From Elie Mystal twitter irisblue Jun 2022 #7
Might explain the timing, Corgigal Jun 2022 #8
I expect the Court is going to pull a lot of bad decisions out of their ass this session. n/t malthaussen Jun 2022 #9
The biggest quirk in NY law was the NYC required an approved license for the city Historic NY Jun 2022 #10
Any license based on a "need to defend" has... LudwigPastorius Jun 2022 #51
Does it apply to the property of the conservative justices? milestogo Jun 2022 #11
I think NY should defy Marthe48 Jun 2022 #12
The Constitution is the law of the land melm00se Jun 2022 #35
The Constitution grants enforcement to the Executive MarcA Jun 2022 #40
Biden would never be so irresponsible as to sanction the concept of "Screw the Supreme Court" Midwestern Democrat Jun 2022 #63
It is not a matter of "like". It's a matter of Values. MarcA Jun 2022 #70
Yes Marthe48 Jun 2022 #41
It would open up a can of worms Polybius Jun 2022 #42
I can see NY defying the court Marthe48 Jun 2022 #48
Charge $25,000 to get a permit. Ghost of Tom Joad Jun 2022 #13
You can't make rights inaccessable through onerous fines and fees ripcord Jun 2022 #38
It's already almost $400 for the application in NYC Polybius Jun 2022 #44
This guarantees there will be no meaningful gun reform. AngryOldDem Jun 2022 #14
While a Democratic House passes a bill to increase SC's personal security BeyondGeography Jun 2022 #16
We are now at its closest point.... The Grand Illuminist Jun 2022 #17
The same Supremes who whine Retrograde Jun 2022 #18
Just another day to send a special thank you again to Hav Jun 2022 #19
Those idiots have no credibility. This was so predictable JohnSJ Jun 2022 #25
This is worse then I thought it would be DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2022 #20
Since when has history Sgent Jun 2022 #26
I honestly don't know DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2022 #33
All I know is, I don't want to hear these assholes screaming that the govt. wants their damn guns. AngryOldDem Jun 2022 #21
What the hell did people think was going to happen when trump won in 2016? JohnSJ Jun 2022 #22
Honestly I think we should strike Marbury v. Madison down by EO and see what they try to do about it bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #23
Where will it end? patphil Jun 2022 #24
WE NEED A NEW COURT. ASAP Xoan Jun 2022 #27
Trump packed the courts with RW extremists IronLionZion Jun 2022 #29
Kick & recommend for visibility bronxiteforever Jun 2022 #31
OMG RevBrotherThomas Jun 2022 #32
When Congress recently approved additional security for USSC judges it was in2herbs Jun 2022 #34
Congress controls the federal budget. Dysfunctional Jun 2022 #36
Then the Ds need to inform the voters that more Ds are needed in Congress to in2herbs Jun 2022 #39
"It's a big club. And you ain't in it" The Mouth Jun 2022 #62
Permits are still required to carry concealed ripcord Jun 2022 #37
How did they go from "well ordered militia" to, "everyone for themselves" ? NullTuples Jun 2022 #46
I have no idea ripcord Jun 2022 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author NullTuples Jun 2022 #43
Thomas writes? housecat Jun 2022 #49
Who paid off Kavanaugh's debts? SergeStorms Jun 2022 #50
I'm confused. When it serves the whackadoodles desires the SCOTUS sides with "states rights" - when NoMoreRepugs Jun 2022 #52
Incorporation through the due process clause of the 14th amendment Zeitghost Jun 2022 #59
That's basically Stand your ground wherever you are! bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #53
Meanwhile in the old West, BidenRocks Jun 2022 #56
Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in Bruen is a perfect example of what I call a "pivotal concurrence" mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #57
This thread is worth the read FBaggins Jun 2022 #69
Now that there's basically open carry everywhere... SpankMe Jun 2022 #58
Are these people owned and paid for, or what? C Moon Jun 2022 #60
A question i've ALWAYS had here is the courts are full steam ahead for gun freedoms, BUT bluestarone Jun 2022 #61
Statement by President Joe Biden on Supreme Court Ruling on Guns LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #64
Wondering if historically this decision will be the worst one. ificandream Jun 2022 #65
Besides upping the license fee.. raising2moredems Jun 2022 #66
It's already $350+ in NYC, pass or fail Polybius Jun 2022 #67
Winning Lawyers in Supreme Court Gun Case Leave Firm mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #68
... ck4829 Jul 2022 #72
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court says N.Y. g...