Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

calimary

(83,453 posts)

15. And they're not gonna pay attention to him.

Reply to meow2u3 (Reply #8)

Sat Jan 1, 2022, 02:26 AM

Jan 2022

There are no consequences for doing so. They can just trample their merry way across any part of the Constitution they find inconvenient.

They are agenda-driven.

With apologies to James Carville, it’s the AGENDA, stupid.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chief justice: Judges must better avoid financial conflicts [View all] Omaha Steve Dec 2021 OP

Or Else! dalton99a Dec 2021 #1

They take it seriously? Have these judges been indicted? SheltieLover Dec 2021 #2

Very seriously NQAS Dec 2021 #3

And political conflicts. Baitball Blogger Dec 2021 #4

Yup. Bought and paid for. /nt bucolic_frolic Dec 2021 #5

The Judiciary takes this matter seriously? As in a strongly worded letter seriously? Autumn Dec 2021 #6

He's concerned rpannier Dec 2021 #11

Look up concern and her picture is next to it. Autumn Dec 2021 #12

...and the absolute silence from his court about Clarence... Grins Jan 2022 #31

OMG should they be expecting a sternly worded letter from Roberts??? nt in2herbs Dec 2021 #7

A letter would be considered too strong for CJR. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2022 #32

I'll believe it when the RW SCOTUS "Justices" recuse themselves meow2u3 Dec 2021 #8

And they're not gonna pay attention to him. calimary Jan 2022 #15

A person would have to be fubar'd to believe this in this day & age ?????? monkeyman1 Dec 2021 #9

This is laughable from a "judge" who declared for and licensed corruption in "Citizens United." NNadir Dec 2021 #10

"Chief Justice" Roberts trying to look like he's still in charge PlanetBev Dec 2021 #13

Good God Roberts, have you no shame? Cozmo Jan 2022 #14

I'm sure that'll do it. ...nt 2naSalit Jan 2022 #16

Well Johnny can I call you Johnny, maybe you should start with Thomas and his wife and the turbinetree Jan 2022 #17

Roberts said he was just an umpire.. mountain grammy Jan 2022 #18

Looking at you, Justice Thomas. Midnight Writer Jan 2022 #19

Ouch! My wrists! dchill Jan 2022 #20

Or what? Double secret probation? twodogsbarking Jan 2022 #21

The SC is a partisan joke. BlueIdaho Jan 2022 #22

If Only The M$M Treated Financial Conflicts modrepub Jan 2022 #23

Judges Have Other, Worse Conflicts DallasNE Jan 2022 #24

Cough cough, Clarence Thomas, Kegger Kavanaugh Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2022 #25

Today's NYT raises an issue re sexual harassment claims in the Ninth Circuit, too. ancianita Jan 2022 #26

This focus on "individual stock ownership" feels like a bit like a red herring NullTuples Jan 2022 #27

When you consider that Roberts is responsible for opening the flood of dark money into politics Ford_Prefect Jan 2022 #28

need to go back to traffic court?? monkeyman1 Jan 2022 #29

Really? Closing the gate after the horses left the barn? IzzaNuDay Jan 2022 #30