Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Sen. Leahy, not Supreme Court chief justice, expected to preside over impeachment trial [View all]hedda_foil
(16,466 posts)34. Thanks very much. I missed the period when I tried to figure out what went wrong.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sen. Leahy, not Supreme Court chief justice, expected to preside over impeachment trial [View all]
sabra
Jan 2021
OP
'now that Trump is a former president, Roberts is not constitutionally obligated to preside.'
elleng
Jan 2021
#3
The NY Times article at the link explains that Leahy will be able to vote, and Harris can vote in
Nitram
Jan 2021
#20
Thanks very much. I missed the period when I tried to figure out what went wrong.
hedda_foil
Jan 2021
#34
I don't think this suggests he is a coward. He's handing it over to the Senate because it is
Nitram
Jan 2021
#22
Actually it's the best place to get everything out in the open for both sides assuming
cstanleytech
Jan 2021
#12
I can understand freezing Roberts out given how he behaved with the first trial.
cstanleytech
Jan 2021
#11
Especially considering the post impeachment 1 additional outrageous behavior Trump exhibited......
usaf-vet
Jan 2021
#26