Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kurtcagle

(1,602 posts)
10. Probably not
Sat Nov 14, 2020, 07:52 PM
Nov 2020

There's an interesting legal conundrum that Mitch McConnell is in the center of. Trump abused the acting head policy by never actually submitting anyone to McConnell because the majority leader would then have to hold hearings on the nominees (which would have been bad political press, because the nominees were NOT in general competent for their job). Biden will be submitting his candidates to McConnell, who then MUST hold hearings, or the candidate in question will automatically be appointed after 90 days (I believe). McConnell will have at best a razor-thin majority in the Senate (if only one of the Democrats wins) or will lose control of the Senate (if both win). He's also going into an election cycle in 2022 where the Republicans are vulnerable, and this doesn't rule out a defector in the Senate (my guess would be Murkowski) switching to the Democratic side. This is going to make it a lot harder for him to obstruct appointments.

From the legal side, because Trump failed to submit candidates to the Senate for review, he is effectively in violation of the constitution in his appointments. Biden WILL be submitting candidates, so this won't be an issue. It also means that a significant portion of the EOs that Trump wrote will be found non-binding precisely because his appointments were not reviewed.

"The best lawyers." LOL! mobeau69 Nov 2020 #1
So Chad Wolf was not lawfully appointed? House of Roberts Nov 2020 #2
It's not just that Wolf was an "acting" person leftieNanner Nov 2020 #5
I think that's so in some cases with appointees... 2naSalit Nov 2020 #8
Plus, he overstayed his welcome Warpy Nov 2020 #22
Probably not kurtcagle Nov 2020 #10
Thank you for this very concise, and accurate description of the situation. CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2020 #11
So ..... If Biden submits a name and Mitch refuses a vote can that person be an "Acting Head" ? groundloop Nov 2020 #14
I would like to repeat your question. murielm99 Nov 2020 #17
McConnell can still bottle up the works kurtcagle Nov 2020 #20
Generally speaking, no. onenote Nov 2020 #26
Almost nothing in the "probably not" post is correct. onenote Nov 2020 #23
Man, Trump is just hitting on all legal cylinders right now underpants Nov 2020 #3
:) Wonderful news for so many. I love Judge Garaufis, whoever he or she is. Hortensis Nov 2020 #4
He's a character:Garaufis served nine years as counsel to Queens Borough President Claire Shulman Ford_Prefect Nov 2020 #21
Since my search last night, some things have moved up on Hortensis Nov 2020 #25
Can he now be prosecuted Mme. Defarge Nov 2020 #6
Aren't they all unlawfully appointed? C_U_L8R Nov 2020 #7
No. The Homeland Security situation differs from most. onenote Nov 2020 #24
"I'm sorry, but I've hit the drinking part of the day." BumRushDaShow Nov 2020 #9
Tremendous news! klook Nov 2020 #12
K and R. warmfeet Nov 2020 #13
The really sad part is that much damage probably has already been done. KY_EnviroGuy Nov 2020 #15
Can we take this to mean that any order, directive, or executive action taken by Wolf Ford_Prefect Nov 2020 #16
I hit the drinking part of the day murielm99 Nov 2020 #18
I'd have loved to have been in the White House when Trump heard that. bet his face matched ... marble falls Nov 2020 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge rules actin...»Reply #10