Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,457 posts)
Mon Apr 6, 2020, 01:02 PM Apr 2020

Supreme Court won't review ruling that Metro can ban religious advertising [View all]

Source: Washington Post

Courts & Law

Supreme Court won't review ruling that Metro can ban religious advertising

By Robert Barnes
April 6, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. EDT

The Supreme Court will not take up a lower court's decision that Washington's Metro system did not violate the First Amendment by banning religious advertising.

The court on Monday passed on reviewing a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that upheld the ban on religious messages on buses and trains and in stations as lawful and free from discrimination.

Two justices said the lower-court decision was wrong. But because Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh was recused after earlier work on the case, "it makes a poor candidate for our review," wrote Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, who was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas.

Nonetheless, he wrote, "The First Amendment requires governments to protect religious viewpoints, not single them out for silencing."

The WMATA system was sued by the Archdiocese of Washington for rejecting a proposed advertisement around Christmas 2017. The planned "Find the Perfect Gift" ads featured a biblical Christmas scene and a link to a website that encouraged people to attend Mass or donate to a Catholic charitable group.

{snip}

The case is Archdiocese of Washington v. WMATA. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1455_9h68.pdf

Ann E. Marimow contributed to this story.

Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He joined The Post to cover Maryland politics, and he has served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor and national political editor. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006. Follow https://twitter.com/scotusreporter

Read more:






You'd think that in DC, of all places, anything would go. I'm pretty sure I could handle religious advertising, and I think my fellow passengers -- back when I had fellow passengers -- could handle this too.

Hat tip, Joe.My.God:

SCOTUS: No Religious Ads On DC's Metro System
April 6, 2020

https://www.joemygod.com/2020/04/scotus-no-religious-ads-on-dcs-metro-system/

-- -- -- -- --

Supreme Court won't review ruling that Metro can ban religious advertising


24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I can see this. Because if you allow one, you must allow ALL. oldsoftie Apr 2020 #1
So? NT mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2020 #2
So, I dont want to see some half-assed fake religion/cult advertising for more victims. oldsoftie Apr 2020 #14
The Fake Justice was recused so it would have been a 4-4 tie bucolic_frolic Apr 2020 #3
Yes On 4-4 Tie DallasNE Apr 2020 #19
Go for it Traildogbob Apr 2020 #4
Try advertising penis extenders on PTL Club. marble falls Apr 2020 #5
If they're advertised as a cure for "the gay", praise dog. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2020 #6
Maybe we need to advertise brain enhancers, first? marble falls Apr 2020 #7
If they got one of those, sign me up. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2020 #8
Neither is a government body FBaggins Apr 2020 #9
The Metro Is A Government Entity DallasNE Apr 2020 #10
"Gorsuch needs to read the entire First Amendment." mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2020 #13
Then His Comprehension Stinks n/t DallasNE Apr 2020 #18
Why is Catholic a "conflict" compared to being Jewish or Methodist? oldsoftie Apr 2020 #15
Thomas & Gorsuch Are Unique On The Court DallasNE Apr 2020 #17
We do have the "We hold these truths to be self evident....." in the Constitution. oldsoftie Apr 2020 #20
No, we don't. mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2020 #21
well the Declaration of Independence carries a little weight oldsoftie Apr 2020 #23
I cannot argue with that. I've slipped up like that too. I once started a thread in which I mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2020 #24
Curious... Since Sotamayor is Catholic does that mean she has a conflict? rpannier Apr 2020 #16
Google "Vaughn Walker." mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2020 #22
"The First Amendment requires governments to protect religious viewpoints" No, it merely cstanleytech Apr 2020 #11
How this started: 2018: Metro can ban all religious ads on buses and trains, court rules mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2020 #12
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court won't revie...