Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge Refuses To Delay Her Order For McGahn To Comply With Congressional Subpoena [View all]Fritz Walter
(4,291 posts)39. The American Public doesn't care
Witness the election of Rick Scott as Florida's governor -- for two terms -- and now senator.
From the Tampa Bay Trib, citing a 2014 Democratic Party TV ad:
"Maybe you've heard about what was the largest Medicare fraud in history, committed when Rick Scott was a CEO," the narrator says. "Or that Scott's company paid record fraud fines of $1.7 billion. And when Scott was deposed in lawsuits about his company, he took the Fifth 75 times. Meaning, 75 times, Scott refused to answer questions because if he had he might admit to committing a crime."
...
Scott started his hospital company, Columbia, in 1987 by purchasing two El Paso, Texas, hospitals. He quickly grew the company into one of the country's largest publicly traded hospital chains, and in 1994, merged Columbia with Tennessee-headquartered HCA.
In early 1997, federal agents revealed they were investigating the Columbia/HCA chain for, among other things, Medicare and Medicaid fraud. Allegations included that Columbia/HCA billed Medicare and Medicaid for tests that were not necessary or ordered by physicians, and that the hospital chain would perform one type of medical test but bill the federal government for a more expensive test or procedure. Agents seized records from facilities across the country including in Florida.
Scott resigned in July 1997. Scott said he wanted to fight the federal government accusations, but the corporate board of Columbia/HCA wanted to settle. In 2000, the company pleaded guilty to at least 14 corporate felonies and agreed to pay $840 million in criminal fines and civil damages and penalties.
...
Scott started his hospital company, Columbia, in 1987 by purchasing two El Paso, Texas, hospitals. He quickly grew the company into one of the country's largest publicly traded hospital chains, and in 1994, merged Columbia with Tennessee-headquartered HCA.
In early 1997, federal agents revealed they were investigating the Columbia/HCA chain for, among other things, Medicare and Medicaid fraud. Allegations included that Columbia/HCA billed Medicare and Medicaid for tests that were not necessary or ordered by physicians, and that the hospital chain would perform one type of medical test but bill the federal government for a more expensive test or procedure. Agents seized records from facilities across the country including in Florida.
Scott resigned in July 1997. Scott said he wanted to fight the federal government accusations, but the corporate board of Columbia/HCA wanted to settle. In 2000, the company pleaded guilty to at least 14 corporate felonies and agreed to pay $840 million in criminal fines and civil damages and penalties.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Judge Refuses To Delay Her Order For McGahn To Comply With Congressional Subpoena [View all]
Gothmog
Dec 2019
OP
A district court judge has DENIED the Trump administration's request that she pause her McGahn rulin
Gothmog
Dec 2019
#1
Yeah, I think just about everyone on earth wants to hear what this guy has to say.
Ligyron
Dec 2019
#4
Yes he will. He now has a court order to testify and would be in contempt of court.
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#6
his taking the fifth works for me. nothing screams guilty to the American public than someone
TeamPooka
Dec 2019
#9
I believe the judge outlined what was considered executive privilege in her ruling. He has no
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#24
They are not going to ask him questions that would incriminate him. He already refused to do
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#26
They aren't going to ask questions they don't have the answers to. If they ask anything not
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#31
The judge stated in her ruling what executive privilege involves regarding his testimony, but
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#34
I'm looking forward to it. I'm also wondering what documents Lev Parnas is turning over to
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#36
Judge flays DOJ, calling its arguments 'disingenuous' & 'unacceptable mischaracterization
Gothmog
Dec 2019
#22