Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(3,483 posts)

13. that's what it seems like, offhand, but w/o more info,how are they defining "couple"???

Fri May 24, 2019, 02:34 PM

May 2019

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Alabama votes to end marriage licenses [View all] brooklynite May 2019 OP

my guess is some people would rather be poor and backwards DBoon May 2019 #7

Gawd is their gubment... nt Progressive Jones May 2019 #22

Would such a marriage be legal and recognized procon May 2019 #3

If the state sets out reasonable requirements, here marybourg May 2019 #11

No, it's not about a ceremony, but why doesn't the procon May 2019 #16

The short answer is yes. TomSlick May 2019 #21

How about when the couple divorces and kids and property are involved? FakeNoose May 2019 #4

What happens to divorce? left-of-center2012 May 2019 #5

The reasoning for what they are doing is wrong ToxMarz May 2019 #6

Marriage as a government concern Nasruddin May 2019 #18

I've been saying this for the last 10 years ... aggiesal May 2019 #9

Agreed. IMHO this is an improvement. groundloop May 2019 #12

I agree, this is an improvement n/t aggiesal May 2019 #24

My conservative libertarian/republican atheist friend OriginalGeek May 2019 #14

Sounds like this is a good thing IronLionZion May 2019 #15

"Well, sweetie," an Alabama Republican just told his sister, sandensea May 2019 #19

This doesn't bother me one little bit. BigDemVoter May 2019 #20

Have no problem with the concept at all. Jake Stern May 2019 #23