Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
19. I am okay with self driving cars
Thu Mar 22, 2018, 02:37 PM
Mar 2018

as soon as the manufacturers take full monetary responsibility for every accident that a self driving car is in because of a problem with the hardware or software the car has.

Police have released the first video from inside the Uber self-driving car that killed a pedestrian FrodosNewPet Mar 2018 #1
Driving at 35mph it would take 66 feet Eko Mar 2018 #2
I think an ATTENTIVE human driver would have seen her sooner FrodosNewPet Mar 2018 #3
I am by no means someone who is against the idea of self-driving cars xor Mar 2018 #7
Uber Tempe Video Shows A Crash That Self-Driving Cars Should Be Able To Avoid -- Time For Regulation FrodosNewPet Mar 2018 #4
Dark clothes on a dark unlit street: robbob Mar 2018 #13
Should human drivers be able to avoid this as well? LanternWaste Mar 2018 #15
It doesn't appear the car reacted at all. xor Mar 2018 #17
Someone posted a link to the video Dave was talking about: joshcryer Mar 2018 #23
The LiDAR should have been able to see her from at least 200-250 feet away FrodosNewPet Mar 2018 #25
To answer your question: YES! A reasonable human driver would have had several seconds to react FrodosNewPet Mar 2018 #34
Self driving vehicles....damn, I'm glad my time on earth is about over. Hulk Mar 2018 #5
We're all just human guinea pigs for corporate America's harebrain ideas gyroscope Mar 2018 #6
This is a bit melodramatic, no? ExciteBike66 Mar 2018 #9
And that's relevant...how? Hulk Mar 2018 #20
One person dies and you make it seem like these AVs are ExciteBike66 Mar 2018 #22
Couldn't agree more! joshdawg Mar 2018 #11
I've little doubt the same sentiments were expressed during the 19th century LanternWaste Mar 2018 #14
Another empty analogy. Hulk Mar 2018 #21
I have yet to see one of these drive a snow covered rural road. NutmegYankee Mar 2018 #8
When granny can't distinguish pedestrians from shrubs bucolic_frolic Mar 2018 #10
Of all the world's problems, why are they investing in this needless technology? rgbecker Mar 2018 #12
Fatal flaw in the design - thinking humans behind the wheel are going to remain attentive - theres Kashkakat v.2.0 Mar 2018 #16
I think the ultimate goal is that the human inside the car doesn't have to pay attention xor Mar 2018 #18
I am okay with self driving cars Cold War Spook Mar 2018 #19
The big hurdle will be for the machine to account for unadulterated human stupidity inwiththenew Mar 2018 #24
People do that all the time, especially in states/cities where pedestrians have been programmed... brush Mar 2018 #27
There is an odd dark shadow covering the person prior to coming into view. honest.abe Mar 2018 #26
Are you speculating in the voice of the car or of a human driver? A car with sensors alleged to do.. brush Mar 2018 #28
Im speculating Uber doctored the video to cover their asses... honest.abe Mar 2018 #29
Sensors should've picked up the person anyway. At night those cars don't rely only on cameras. brush Mar 2018 #30
So it seems the sensors were not working correctly either. honest.abe Mar 2018 #31
That's a function of something called "Dynamic Range" FrodosNewPet Mar 2018 #33
Experts: Uber self-driving system should have spotted woman FrodosNewPet Mar 2018 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Arizona police release vi...»Reply #19