Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump dissolves voter fraud commission [View all]riversedge
(70,214 posts)35. nytimes ARTICLE AND STATEMENT FROM WHITE HOUSE......
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/us/politics/trump-voter-fraud-commission.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Trump Disbands Commission on Voter Fraud
Michael Tackett and Michael Wines
4-5 minutes
President Trump in 2016 with Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state who went on to become a member of the White House voter fraud commission. Carolyn Kaster/Associated Press
WASHINGTON ................................
Richard L. Hasen, a law professor and election law scholar at the University of California, Irvine, was sharply critical of the commission in a blog post.
The commission was poorly organized and conceived, he wrote. It tried to operate to a large extent in secrecy, without recognition that doing so would violate the federal laws that govern presidential commissions and that protect privacy.
It made rookie, boneheaded mistakes about handling documents used by the commission, again in violation of federal law. It did not seem to have an endgame, he wrote.
While Mr. Trump has repeatedly claimed there was widespread voter fraud in the 2016 election, he announced the abandonment of the commission late on a day dominated by revelations in a new book about the White House and his presidency. The book, Fire and Fury by Michael Wolff, prompted Mr. Trump to excoriate his former chief political strategist, Stephen K. Bannon.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What he means is the RepubliCons could not suppress even more votes by this underhanded scam. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2018
#1
Despite substantial evidence of voter fraud, HA HA HA yeah right, whatever, LOSER. nt
Leghorn21
Jan 2018
#5
The failure to back up lies with evidence, as courts for some reason insist upon, is frustrating.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2018
#32
Democratic politicians should be pressuring any state level Dems blocking National Popular Vote
yurbud
Jan 2018
#40
Ex-Colo. GOP leader said only Democrats committed voter fraud. Now hes charged with voter fraud.
keithbvadu2
Jan 2018
#13
A voter fraud commission that had Kris Kobach and Ken Blackwell on was akin to ......
Botany
Jan 2018
#15
"Despite substantial evidence of voter fraud" - translated, "there's nothing to see"
George II
Jan 2018
#23
He should send them to Hawaii to follow up all the rumours about birth certificates
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2018
#27
So why didn't they just use the records from the several states that provided them?
progree
Jan 2018
#28