Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,373 posts)
56. Good for her!
Sun Mar 19, 2017, 09:11 AM
Mar 2017

And thanks, TT! You flushed out a couple new enrollees for my Iggy List!

The haters just can't resist.

Corporate contamination patronage job. democratisphere Mar 2017 #1
Out of curiosity, what job WOULD be acceptable for the child of a political figure? brooklynite Mar 2017 #3
I'm pretty certain they'd accept them taking jobs as servers at mom-n-pop vegan restaurants jmowreader Mar 2017 #6
Some meat on the bone would certainly be OK, BUT receiving democratisphere Mar 2017 #7
As usual, no woman is ever well qualified enough. Even a woman with a PhD in International Relations pnwmom Mar 2017 #31
Right Red Mountain Mar 2017 #70
She is a PhD in International Relations with experience running a $2 billion non-profit, pnwmom Mar 2017 #72
You are correct......it's all about connections Red Mountain Mar 2017 #73
No. She wouldn't need a decade or two MORE experience to qualify for this board pnwmom Mar 2017 #75
Fair enough. Red Mountain Mar 2017 #78
I agree with you in principle, Red Mountain. tenorly Mar 2017 #81
No no no she clawed her way to the top of the Clinton charity totem pole and earned every bit of it elehhhhna Mar 2017 #83
Or being on welfare till she is in her late 30's n/t Chevy Mar 2017 #12
LOL SunSeeker Mar 2017 #21
Not sitting on the board of a major corp Mosby Mar 2017 #9
Have you ever interviewed her for a job? How can you judge what someone's qualifications are.... George II Mar 2017 #15
Bill Gates founded and built his own company. If he'd applied to be on the board of a major Calista241 Mar 2017 #27
Actually it compares pretty well, but one would have to take the time to take off synergie Mar 2017 #53
I had to look up the "theater guy" to see who you were talking about - I didn't even have to google Midwestern Democrat Mar 2017 #58
She has a PhD in International Relations and is the Vice Chair of the Clinton Foundation pnwmom Mar 2017 #33
I looked up her CV and saw the DPhil, didin't know what that was Mosby Mar 2017 #64
DPhil is the same as PhD BlueInPhilly Mar 2017 #101
Mosby, you're kidding? You think those are Hortensis Mar 2017 #54
I don't resent her, in fact I like her quite a bit Mosby Mar 2017 #63
Resent her appointment, not her. But, ok, it's the optics. Hortensis Mar 2017 #65
She has been helping to run the $2 billion Clinton Foundation for years, on top of her other pnwmom Mar 2017 #66
Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #84
Well, she is not Catholic and she is married - so nun is out karynnj Mar 2017 #60
Doctor, lawyer, teacher, marine biologist alarimer Mar 2017 #94
So, it's NOT that she's "not qualified"; it's that it's "not FAIR that she's qualified". brooklynite Mar 2017 #95
Nope, it's about the connections, nothing more. alarimer Mar 2017 #97
Why do you say that? How do you blithely come to the conclusion that it's a "patronage job"? George II Mar 2017 #17
If she is half as smart and hard working as her mother, she deserves it. n/t Lil Missy Mar 2017 #99
Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #2
Um, not Ivanka. redwitch Mar 2017 #4
And how did President Clinton do this???? n/t Chevy Mar 2017 #5
Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #8
Then perhaps poster should read op properly n/t Chevy Mar 2017 #11
So why Chelsea Clinton? American aristocratic. She's related to influence. YOHABLO Mar 2017 #10
Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #13
Why not? George II Mar 2017 #14
It might have to do with her resume, that's how it actually works in the USA unless synergie Mar 2017 #52
What a laugh. Right, questioning this is misogyny. JudyM Mar 2017 #59
Actually given that these objections ONLY arise BainsBane Mar 2017 #62
Right, dismissing a woman's accomplishments by reducing her to a mere wife or daughter is misogyny synergie Mar 2017 #67
More of the same, throwing misogyny around every time a woman is criticized. JudyM Mar 2017 #68
Nope. Calling out obvious misogyny when it's pretty undeniable what it is. synergie Mar 2017 #69
No more and no less than accepting her position on merit is corporatism and cronyism. LanternWaste Mar 2017 #93
she is more qualified than W was to sit on any board, but was likely hired for similar reasons yurbud Mar 2017 #102
Except she has the resume to make her far more qualified. synergie Mar 2017 #103
She's qualified for the job.. your sour grapes are showing. Cha Mar 2017 #55
Good for her - wish her all the best in her career. George II Mar 2017 #16
This is wonderful news! She's very talented. They're fortunate to have her. NurseJackie Mar 2017 #18
It's all in the name Edina Mar 2017 #20
You are spot on!! riversedge Mar 2017 #77
I agree, Edina. brer cat Mar 2017 #80
+1 betsuni Mar 2017 #87
Emails and speeches. And having a twitter profile etc etc. n/t Chevy Mar 2017 #23
How dare she earn a living BainsBane Mar 2017 #19
$300,000 a year is more than just "earning a living". That's over a quarter of a million a year. KittyWampus Mar 2017 #24
How is that a problem? BainsBane Mar 2017 #25
LOL! I simply posted that earning over a quarter million a year is more than "earning a living" KittyWampus Mar 2017 #26
Exactly - as if being well-educated, with onetexan Mar 2017 #82
Tell me, all: How many people here have served on a Board of Directors? brooklynite Mar 2017 #96
Yes, they must take a vow of poverty. betsuni Mar 2017 #91
Even a low level CEO makes 100k a year plus benefits. 300k to work 'managing' Expedia is in line. Sunlei Mar 2017 #90
Good for her. We need more progressive women like Chelsea on corporate boards. nt SunSeeker Mar 2017 #22
I think some aren't aware of her educational and professional background Bradical79 Mar 2017 #28
Whatever anyone's opinion of Chelsea and her qualifacations , nocalflea Mar 2017 #29
The optics for any reasonable person is that her PhD in International Relations from Oxford pnwmom Mar 2017 #30
Who ever said the opposition is/was reasonable ? nocalflea Mar 2017 #34
Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #32
That's absolutely not true. Hillary never said that -- and she supported $15 minimum in the platform pnwmom Mar 2017 #35
Lesson learned-I hope riversedge Mar 2017 #37
That accusation against Hillary really startled me. nocalflea Mar 2017 #39
Google it. It's pretty easy to find Egnever Mar 2017 #42
Thanks nocalflea Mar 2017 #43
You can also google that she supported everything in the Democratic platform including the $15. pnwmom Mar 2017 #45
Oh good lord Egnever Mar 2017 #47
That was dated in MAY. Why do you insist on pointing to her position in the primary, pnwmom Mar 2017 #49
Because she was not a strong suporter which is what was claimed. Egnever Mar 2017 #51
And he/she deleted his/her post . Poor Skeeter . nocalflea Mar 2017 #40
No not really no Egnever Mar 2017 #41
After negotiations, she strongly supported the $15 in the platform and that's how she ran pnwmom Mar 2017 #44
Just like many of her positions Egnever Mar 2017 #46
She previously explained that the research had proven that an increase to $12 pnwmom Mar 2017 #48
She says it herself on her website see the link in my reply above Egnever Mar 2017 #50
I can't fucking believe you are going on about this BainsBane Mar 2017 #61
Source ? That doesn't sound like Hillary to me . nocalflea Mar 2017 #36
She will have a happier life not fooled Mar 2017 #71
Agree. Chelsea is very politically savvy. I do wish her the best. nocalflea Mar 2017 #85
Good luck in your new job Chelsea riversedge Mar 2017 #38
Luck not needed Red Mountain Mar 2017 #74
Good for her! BlueMTexpat Mar 2017 #56
Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #57
Hey, I offered to join the board for less than that.... never heard back from them. pangaia Mar 2017 #76
Crony capitalism elehhhhna Mar 2017 #79
She has a Phd in International Relations from Oxford. msanthrope Mar 2017 #100
Oh dear, the Clinton haters are getting worked up again. betsuni Mar 2017 #86
HOW DARE SHE DO ANYTHING WITH HER LIFE!!!! xor Mar 2017 #88
That's a very good position, good job Chelsea Clinton! I like Expedia travel services. Sunlei Mar 2017 #89
Could have hired a few people for that amount miyazaki Mar 2017 #92
Predictable... Blue_Tires Mar 2017 #98
It's their money, they can spend it any way they like... hughee99 Mar 2017 #104
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chelsea Clinton joins Exp...»Reply #56