Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Study: negative media coverage of Clinton soared in the last two weeks of the campaign [View all]
Source: Vox
Ten of Americas most prominent media outlets ramped up their negative coverage of Hillary Clinton in the final two weeks of the presidential campaign while also writing fewer positive stories about her, according to a new report released today by Harvard University researchers.
From late September to the middle of October around the time of the presidential debates the ratio of critical coverage of Clinton was roughly three positive stories for every two negative ones.
But as the election headed to a close, that gap dramatically widened. In the final two weeks, there were closer to seven negative pieces about Clinton for every two positive pieces, according to the report from Harvards Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy.
Of course, part of that change was driven by new facts on the ground like the revelations about the FBIs decision to briefly reopen an investigation into Clintons private email server, and the WikiLeaks disclosures that Donald Trump voters may regard as legitimate reasons for more negative stories. But whatever the cause, according to the Harvard report, talk of Clintons alleged scandals hit their peak right before Election Day.
Read more: http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/7/13872580/media-coverage-presidential-election
New study from Harvard confirms how the election was corrupted by a combination of FBI meddling in the election along with Russian sourced disclosures to wikileaks.