Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mntleo2

(2,535 posts)
20. Activist for low income families here ...
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 03:00 PM
Jun 2012

CPS loves them some little baybees since they can sell (adopt) them easily but teens and preteens, not so much. They continue to collect between $6-8000 per month per child, however no matter if that teen is on the streets or not. This is why you see so many "colonies" of runaway foster kids congregating under your bridges and huddling in your doorways. There is no accountability and many of these kids have been in the System for years. CPS and their DFS agencies as well as legislators know that only about 15% of the children they take are truly being abused. They know that if they gave the birth families services instead of taking the kids this has far greater success rates with these children, and they know full well that after putting them into foster care that these kids are 5-7 X more likely to be abused. But CPS also collects between $6-8000 per month per child from Title IV mandated funding alone. They also go in and take about 1/3 of the TANF (welfare), food stamps and Medicaid money on top of that Title IV funding.

TItle IV mandates say, "The more kids you take, the more money you will make. If you return these kids home, you will LOSE all present and future funding..." Also although it is a federal crime worth up to 20 years in prison for a government official to commit perjury in court, family court has been rigged. These case managers and all their contracted minions can go into court and LIE and have complete immunity (including their rubber stamp GALs who are also collecting $Millions in government grants to be "independent" but are not). These social workers stand to collect personal bonuses as well for every kid they take and while it is a federal offense to commit perjury they do it all the time because they are immune and stand to collect those bonuses. Who cares if they falsely accuse someone when there is money to be made? Who cares if the child is further abused since then they can collect even MORE $$$ because now the child is "disabled". And do not get me started on all the $Millions the pharmaceuticals are getting for drugging these kids when they are in grief from being dragged from their homes and cut off from their entire family.

There is more than just a few states doing this, ALL of them are doing it, thanks mostly to Title IV funding. Furthermore harvesting low income kids from their families is a way to get ever dwindling "discretionary' funding in order to keep more funding coming in, their jobs to continue, and those bonuses coming. As services such as childcare, food stamps, energy assistance s cut off, more and more low income families are being destroyed. They've used low income families as "canaries in the mine" to undermine laws and parental rights whenever, so whenever they go after upper income families these relatives are all surprised and put themselves in hawk to defend themselves. These officials and the judges involved (making 6 figure salaries themselves) are well aware that low income families cannot defend themselves adequately. They are "easy pickin's and the easing up of anything formal in these "quasi-courts" simply makes it quite easy to take children and terminate parental rights. As an activist, I have seen entire low income housing complexes cleaned out of children by CPS where the kids are taken and "sold" (more bonuses and adoption fees). And adoptions do not fare much better than foster care as far as abuse is concerned, I work with formerly adopted adults and the stories I have been told give me nightmares.

The issues with these teens are that DFS will continue to collect their Title IV/TANF/food stamps/Medicaid funding whether or not the kid is well cared for ~ or if they are on the streets. While it is illegal in most (if not all) states to take children due to poverty, the conditions of poverty are direct legal definitions of "maltreatment and neglect". Therefore jerking them out of their family homes, leaving these kids to wander the streets, the schools not to be too concerned when kids do not show up, and foster parents get good legal defense if it even occurs to anyone that perhaps THEY were not watching closely enough, unlike extended families such as grandparents who do not get ANY legal defense. Everyone except family to these children are generously funded and let off the hook so nobody has to worry about being held accountable. I would not be surprised to see boys also being pimped, if not molested and raped in their "safe" homes. This is the way it goes ...

Then the media wonders why this happens. People like me can tell them what is going on, but they will not listen ~ and frankly few here will listen either. One solution to this issue is to give families services and no more austerity cuts. If you ever notice your states' budget you will discover, they cut EVERYTHING BUT CPS. After refusing low wage working families any assistance, then comes the harvesting of their kids. Teens and preteens cut off from their families and left to their own devices, is just another money-maker for both legal and illegal predators...

Cat in Seattle

Florida, to the (non) rescue of abused children, again... Scairp Jun 2012 #1
We live in an age when predators rule. Not just on Wall Street. mia Jun 2012 #2
That's a very prolific, spot on, and sadly quite true statement. That does sum up RKP5637 Jun 2012 #3
+1 freshwest Jun 2012 #9
Anthropophagopoly JHB Jun 2012 #13
Yes. and I worry about foster kids today... CoffeeCat Jun 2012 #10
Please remember, mzteris Jun 2012 #5
Thankfully, Ohio just passed legislation... du_grad Jun 2012 #4
Good news. mia Jun 2012 #6
Wow I just assumed Scairp Jun 2012 #7
Me too.. whathehell Jun 2012 #8
Yes, it is. ChazII Jun 2012 #11
Thanks for the link...n/t whathehell Jun 2012 #14
Every state ChazII Jul 2012 #40
I have no words! Odin2005 Jun 2012 #12
I sure hope this thread doesn't find the lineup of defenders of the sex trade Skidmore Jun 2012 #15
There is a difference between a legal sex trade 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #17
Merely the amount of day LanternWaste Jun 2012 #18
So you see no moral difference 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #19
Girls Like Us: Fighting for a World Where Girls Are Not for Sale by Rachel Lloyd proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #21
Again: those are children 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #22
Victims of underage exploitation may age into the category of trafficked adults, and the difference proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #25
Human trafficking is wrong and illegal no matter the age 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #27
The difference is between the ages. I believe I stated that.. LanternWaste Jun 2012 #23
You stated that the difference between a minor and an adult 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #24
late term abortion.... eek MD Jul 2012 #37
So . . . send everyone involved to jail for a long time 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #16
Activist for low income families here ... mntleo2 Jun 2012 #20
Speechless. (eom) proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #26
People like me can tell them what is going on, but they will not listen ~ and frankly few here will mia Jun 2012 #28
This is because they think our states are "saving the little baybees" .... mntleo2 Jun 2012 #29
Hey Cat Megahurtz Jun 2012 #33
CPS is beyond corrupt and few know about it mntleo2 Jun 2012 #35
Thank you for this post. mia Jul 2012 #38
K&R n/t bobthedrummer Jun 2012 #30
Desperate children caroll31 Jun 2012 #31
And also that the scumbags within the System using kids to make money ... mntleo2 Jun 2012 #32
The rabbit hole goes way deep Megahurtz Jun 2012 #34
More from http://protect.org/ . proverbialwisdom Jul 2012 #36
That's totally disgusting. PlutoX Jul 2012 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Foster kids would leave f...»Reply #20